Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Baitball Blogger

(49,641 posts)

2. Good point.

Reply to no_hypocrisy (Original post)

Thu Mar 27, 2025, 08:20 PM

Mar 27

I do have a question on how a political law firm can claim objectivity when they have lawyers from both parties in the law firm. Morgan and Morgan is one of them. If I were a client I would NOT trust the firewall concept.

On Edit: I left out the negative. I know two people rec'd this post before I made myself clear. Central Florida has a strange good ole boy situation going on with public lawyers and I just wouldn't trust any law firm that has includes them as partners when they're from both parties.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

SheltieLover Arger68

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You do realize that Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP [View all] no_hypocrisy Mar 27 OP

effing cowards appease the tyrant without a fight nt msongs Mar 27 #1

Good point. Baitball Blogger Mar 27 #2

Some conflicts can be waived, after full disclosure. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #4

I miswrote that. I would not trust the firewall concept because I know how the good ole boy work in our Baitball Blogger Mar 27 #6

That is an issue. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #7

Yep. Baitball Blogger Mar 27 #8

They aren't doing pro bono work **for the government**. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #3

Attorneys will demand your voting record before they represent you. Irish_Dem Mar 27 #5