Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Ms. Toad

(36,470 posts)

4. Some conflicts can be waived, after full disclosure.

Reply to Baitball Blogger (Reply #2)

Thu Mar 27, 2025, 08:26 PM

Mar 27

But there has to be full disclosure and a waiver by all conflicted parties.

And I'm pretty sure having counsel for both parties on the same case (or closely related matters) is not waivable.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You do realize that Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP [View all] no_hypocrisy Mar 27 OP

effing cowards appease the tyrant without a fight nt msongs Mar 27 #1

Good point. Baitball Blogger Mar 27 #2

Some conflicts can be waived, after full disclosure. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #4

I miswrote that. I would not trust the firewall concept because I know how the good ole boy work in our Baitball Blogger Mar 27 #6

That is an issue. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #7

Yep. Baitball Blogger Mar 27 #8

They aren't doing pro bono work **for the government**. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #3

Attorneys will demand your voting record before they represent you. Irish_Dem Mar 27 #5