Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

stopdiggin

(13,544 posts)

21. what on earth makes you think I should (or would) be compelled

Reply to dpibel (Reply #20)

Fri Mar 28, 2025, 12:48 AM

Friday

to dance to your tune? I feel quite comfortable in the argument and assertions that I have made. (without thinking it necessary to compile, or really even contemplate, any manner of childish homework assignment ! ) How silly!

Are you trying to suggest that the Times does NOT publish a great deal of work critical to Trump and the GOP? How foolish and absurd! What rubbish!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NYT pro-level both-sidesing [View all] dpibel Mar 27 OP

Rhetorical question: Why is anyone still reading or subscribing to the NYTs. jrthin Mar 27 #1

No SocialDemocrat61 Mar 27 #2

Sad how far that paper has fallen. And the RW claims it's "way to the left kerry-is-my-prez Mar 27 #11

Not to DU's high standards. maxsolomon Mar 27 #18

we aren't PAYING them to check in with "The White Lotus" while discussing secure material lapfog_1 Mar 27 #3

also a fairly cogent (and accessible) handling of the issue stopdiggin Mar 27 #4

The NYTs give w/one hand and takes back w/the other. jrthin Mar 27 #8

as opposed to those that are busy shoveling manure stopdiggin Mar 27 #10

Then stop following the particular argument that has circle "round, and done to the point jrthin Mar 27 #12

nah. as long as someone feels obligated to trot out a particular tired old saw stopdiggin Mar 27 #15

At least you concede the bias dpibel Mar 27 #17

I can point to 'loads' of reporting where the Times has taken a chunk out of Republicans stopdiggin Mar 27 #19

Fair or not fair? dpibel Mar 27 #20

what on earth makes you think I should (or would) be compelled stopdiggin Friday #21

This you? dpibel Friday #22

if I WANTED to, yes. stopdiggin Friday #23

There's always the supporting your argument part dpibel Friday #24

the 'argument' doesn't need support stopdiggin Friday #26

The way that they diminish the importance: Oh, you want to watch White Lotus Prairie Gates Mar 27 #5

Y'know, that server Hillary Clinton had Bettie Mar 27 #6

It's Regime media. bronxiteforever Mar 27 #7

"the morning" IS editorial. maxsolomon Mar 27 #9

News analysis, actually dpibel Mar 27 #14

"News Analysis" gives reporters leeway to include opinion maxsolomon Friday #27

I check Fox most days there's a big screwup hoping to see some sanity. kerry-is-my-prez Mar 27 #13

Jaw dropping. Ms. Toad Mar 27 #16

You'd almost think there was an agenda... dpibel Friday #25