Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bayard

(24,777 posts)

2. Unfortunately, no one ever thought about a member of NATO going nuts

Reply to Swede (Original post)

Sun Mar 30, 2025, 04:17 PM

Mar 30

A whole different ball game.

"Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, the foundational document of NATO, states that an armed attack against one or more NATO members is considered an attack against all, obligating members to assist the attacked party, including the use of armed force if deemed necessary. "

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

GentryDixon

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ask Reddit: What are your plans in case NATO is forced to declare Article 5 to protect Canada and Greenland? [View all] Swede Mar 30 OP

I'll support NATO, Canada and Greenland (and Panama too)...the Dic-tater can put me in prison if he wants... wcmagumba Mar 30 #1

Unfortunately, no one ever thought about a member of NATO going nuts Bayard Mar 30 #2

Drump will just have to punch himself in the face to fulfill our Article 5 obligation...ha! wcmagumba Mar 30 #3

The backpfeifengesicht is so strong with the Felon that Jerry2144 Mar 30 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author wcmagumba Mar 30 #8

Resistance from within... EarthFirst Mar 30 #4

Bullies unually back down when challenged. NATO should go for it. brush Mar 30 #5

Trumpists have made plans -- it's worth considering TommyT139 Mar 30 #6