Let's have a poll on JFK

[JackRiddler]

36. And this is not what I said.

Last edited Sat Nov 16, 2013, 10:30 PM - Edit history (1)

Which you can read in the very same post you are replying to, and falsely characterizing.

What I am saying is that the believers in the official story do not get to use name-calling along the lines of fringe, crazy loners, tinfoil hats, right-wing, etc. etc. They have to at least acknowledge the majority view. Obviously the majority can still be wrong. But the minority shouldn't present itself as a majority, or claim a hegemony over legitimate opinion. They also aren't entitled to that within the subset of leftists and liberals (where the "conspiracy panic" rhetoric and psychological bullshit is particularly pronounced). Now we can have a discussion on the facts of the case, including the history and context, rather than the distraction of psychological bullshit that seeks to pathologize speakers and avoid case evidence.