General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's have a poll on JFK [View all]JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)It's not a "theory" if it's obviously false, as the WCR is.
If you were accused of a murder, and had an airtight alibi because you were seen on TV in the audience at a live show of "Dancing With the Stars" (you like that show, don't you?) during the murder, that would mean the end of the "theory" that you had done it. You would be free to attack said "theory" without being required to produce the real killer.
Of course, I am proposing an alternative, and it seems 55% of DUers have no trouble understanding it. It is based on the fact that the WCR is false. Therefore the government has been engaged in a 50-year-cover-up. This brings up unavoidable conclusions about where the conspiracy was located, which happen to fit the historical context well.
You're also failing to understand this, although I've made it clear and any further attempts to educate you are superfluous.