General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DU has not "changed" [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)during '04, and neither was the OP. So I was only talking about the years we 'shared' here.
Oh, absolutely agreed about the kiss-and-makeup only lasting a matter of days.
What caused the biggest change here, IMHO, was the rule change from allowing "constructive criticism" of Dems to allowing any and all "criticism". The result was exactly the same as it would have been had FreeRepublic announced they were allowing "any and all criticism" of Dubya two years into his pResidancy, i.e. lots of libs would have signed-up there posing as "disappointed GOPers" just so they could bash Bush endlessly.
That was the end of my days as a DUer. The welcome mat was laid out for the RW trolls - as long as they maintained their "I'm just a disgruntled Democrat" cover story.
I'm sure that if I could go back in time and post a DU poll before Obama's inauguration asking: "Do you foresee a day when a post calling any Democrat, no less a Democratic president, a piece of shit used car salesman will wind up at the top of the Greatest Page?", the answer would have been a resounding NO FUCKIN' WAY!
DU used to be, as the TOS once stated, a "sanctuary" from the endless Dem-bashing in the MSM. It has now become the go-to place for the worst of that bashing.