Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)David Sirota: Clinton Isn’t Warren, No Matter What Her Allies Say [View all]
from In These Times:
Clinton Isnt Warren, No Matter What Her Allies Say
Despite recent claims by Hillary Clinton constituents that she aligns with Elizabeth Warren, a look at her track record proves otherwise.
BY David Sirota
Hillary Clintons political allies want Democratic primary voters to believe that the former secretary of state is just like populist Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and they've been claiming that there are no differences between the two possible presidential contenders. Theres just one problem: Thats not true.
Clinton last week filled in for George W. Bush at an Ameriprise conference, continuing a speaking tour that is raking in big money from Wall Street. One of her aides later downplayed the idea that Clintons relationship with the financial sector could be a political liability for her, should she face Warren in the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries. The aide defiantly insisted that the two are exactly the same.
Ask any so-called 'left' or 'liberal' critic of Hillary to name a single vote or position (on) which Elizabeth Warren and Hillary would disagree, said the Clinton strategist to The Hill newspaper.
OK, fine. Ill take the challengethere are many differences between these two politicians.
For example, in her book, The Two Income Trap, Warren slammed Clinton for casting a Senate vote in 2001 for a bankruptcy bill that ultimately passed in 2005. That legislation makes it more difficult for credit card customers to renegotiate their debts, even as it allows the wealthy to protect their second homes and yachts from creditors. According to a 2009 study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the bankruptcy bills provisions changing debt payback provisions played a central role in the foreclosure crisis, as the new law forced homeowners to pay off credit card debts before paying their mortgage. ...............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://inthesetimes.com/article/17021/Clinton-Warren-differences
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
To be honest, I thought Hillary abstained from voting on Bankruptcy Deform.
closeupready
Aug 2014
#2
She voted for the 2001 bill which didn't pass and missed the vote on the 2005 bill.
PoliticAverse
Aug 2014
#5
Why would Hillary be Warren or why would Warren be Clinton? How do you determing who would be
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#6
Who supported Eugene McCarthy as a junior in college, and then campaigned for McGovern in '72
BeyondGeography
Aug 2014
#25
Hey, good point. Richard Shelby was a Democrat when *he* was 46 years old....
beerandjesus
Aug 2014
#28
I guess just as easily as wingnuts "deflate" Thom Hartmann for campaigning for Goldwater...
cascadiance
Aug 2014
#48
How dare you not toe the DU line when it comes to the infallible Warren...
Cali_Democrat
Aug 2014
#35
If anyone is looking for any dem to mildly criticize and say, maybe, just maybe
joeybee12
Aug 2014
#29
I would vote for Warren over Hillary but I have some suspicions about what role Warren is...
L0oniX
Aug 2014
#10
It is going to be hard to find a candidate who is mot supported by corporations.
Thinkingabout
Aug 2014
#47
To be fair Clinton was in the Senate for eight years whereas Warren has only been in
totodeinhere
Aug 2014
#36
that is_why he will never get my vote. clinton better step up. I'm already tired of her and her tin
roguevalley
Aug 2014
#44