Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Shut Discussionist down!... [View all]Calista241
(5,603 posts)320. Maybe they couldn't afford to continue operating DU without taking
On some additional revenue streams. I don't see anyone here offering up to pay for people's mortgages and college funds. I personally would like to continue using DU, and if that means the owners have a side business, who cares?
I seriously doubt they started Discussionist to preach hate and dilute DU.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
441 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Went there to take a good look. There was a racist video posted and they all high fived each other.
freshwest
Aug 2014
#104
i've gotten several posts by nasty rethugs hidden. place is kinda fun\sad at the same time.
dionysus
Sep 2014
#396
Yes, but it's there. Now, thanks to some of our "friends" the meta has been dragged here.
rhett o rick
Sep 2014
#412
If I get every other post hidden over here for being a misogynistic female, why would I make it for
lonestarnot
Aug 2014
#15
much of what is there is beyond horrible. Festering hate fest for the most part.
NRaleighLiberal
Aug 2014
#18
I used to harass right wingers on a couple other sites ... now I use DI for that purpose.
JoePhilly
Sep 2014
#165
Disagreement of opinion one thing, bigotry & stupidity a whole 'nother ballgame.
alp227
Aug 2014
#48
Better to not donate to DU until it's gone. I'm not giving extra money to get rid of their shit.
cui bono
Aug 2014
#69
Who's library girl? I've seen her mentioned both here and on Discussionist but have never seen
Louisiana1976
Aug 2014
#92
I've seen a few Freeper posts and they're nothing like the low IQ Neanderthals
BlueCaliDem
Sep 2014
#154
Why not? You expect these guys to run a charity for your benefit? Buy the site if you don't
MADem
Sep 2014
#389
Annnnnnnnnnd...... so? This is their JOB. This is a private site. The owners make the rules.
MADem
Sep 2014
#398
Let's start with how it gives misogynists and racists yet another platform on the internet.
NuclearDem
Aug 2014
#45
That isn't what I asked. Do you think that banning Discussionist will eliminate misogyny and rascism
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#60
Sorry I forgot that you can't have a decent discussion w/o the "derp". Never mind. nm
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#74
I asked how the website Discussionist harmed DU and you responded with some thing
rhett o rick
Sep 2014
#167
That second part sounds correct. But it's not going anywhere, anyway. This is just a rant.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#107
You think? In fact I find it quite hypocritical that a progressive would demand another site be
still_one
Aug 2014
#77
Each site has their own charter, which establishes the rules. Free speech, no, but the sites
still_one
Sep 2014
#109
I am west coast time. Regardless, I probably did not articulate properly. Have a good night
still_one
Sep 2014
#121
Yes it is. And my withholding my hard earned money from those who make money off that shit
cui bono
Aug 2014
#80
Then don't donate. I suspect they make enough with ads now. They have been established long enough
still_one
Aug 2014
#84
I already said I wasn't going to donate in the post you initially responded to...
cui bono
Aug 2014
#89
Not at all. You responded to my post that you were NOT going to donate, and I responded back.
still_one
Aug 2014
#95
The last post I meant NOT donate. typo, I will change that now. My main point was I think DU is
still_one
Aug 2014
#105
Its both. Maybe you should start your own progressive site if you think you can do better
still_one
Aug 2014
#86
skinner has every right to open up another forum with its own rules. That is what I meant. This is
still_one
Aug 2014
#99
First of all I never said anyone should or should not donate, and I have no idea where you got that
still_one
Sep 2014
#383
People have choices in regard to the internet. My view is they don't care for a site, don't go
still_one
Sep 2014
#118
Why? I don't go there. It is a business enterprise I am sure. So the same person who started DU
still_one
Aug 2014
#67
I don't even do that based on what I have heard some folks here say. Same reason I have never been
still_one
Aug 2014
#102
I've only lurked when I've seen a link here. They hate the BOG and HOF especially.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#108
I am not sure if that says much because there are some here who are quite critical of the President
still_one
Sep 2014
#111
Sorry. It'll never happen. It does have a Libertarian and Republican forum there. Good riddance.
freshwest
Sep 2014
#110
How is it not associated with DU if it has the same owners and is advertised on the front page? n/t
seaglass
Sep 2014
#147
I have no idea what else they own because they don't advertise it here afaik.
seaglass
Sep 2014
#155
it' the luck of the draw on juries. I i alerted on a sexist post and it was removed on a 5-1 vote,
dionysus
Sep 2014
#414
The best way to protest the site is not to go over there. If all progressives and DU members did
still_one
Sep 2014
#113
I saw GBV in the late 90s or early 2000s, with John Doe from X I think.
Warren DeMontague
Sep 2014
#292
It was the Attitude. There was no comfort to a member who was hurt, threatened.
JaydenD
Sep 2014
#214
It would be just the biggest loss to the world if Discussionist was shut down, I know.
kcr
Sep 2014
#260
Because I happen to think that siloing ourselves in echo chambers is a generally unhealthy
Ms. Toad
Sep 2014
#275
Yeah, I spent about 10 minutes there and came racing back here. If I wanted to read bigoted
catbyte
Sep 2014
#198
No. I don't believe we should shut down our freedom to speak and be heard.
BlueCaliDem
Sep 2014
#207
They should not hand over ISP information to BainsBane. They should comply with a lawful
msanthrope
Sep 2014
#373
I got a rapey pm here once a long time ago, should I have demanded the ISP of the banned troll?
polly7
Sep 2014
#385
Probably because he objects to women on this site being threatened with rape
BainsBane
Sep 2014
#303
I've seen a massive influx of trolls to DU recently, and I think Discussionist is to blame. n/t
ColesCountyDem
Sep 2014
#284
^^^^^This. Liberal schmiberal. This makes it clear that DU is not about liberal politics.
Squinch
Sep 2014
#299
While I rec'd this thread, I don't believe Discussionist needs to be shut down
BainsBane
Sep 2014
#301
You DID choose to post in this particular thread. You didn't have to, you know!
CaliforniaPeggy
Sep 2014
#308
I have an account there and post on average once or twice a week. I'm not particularly fond of it.
stevenleser
Sep 2014
#358
Totally understand. I don't like it so MAKE IT GO AWAY! Would that the world were so simple...
cherokeeprogressive
Sep 2014
#376
Timeframe is everything. Pre-Obama? Snowden and Greenwald would both have statues already.
cherokeeprogressive
Sep 2014
#381
if you don't like it, don't go there. there's plenty of liberals on there fighting the neanderthal
dionysus
Sep 2014
#413
When you say "this forum" are you referring to the whole DU discussion board?
cyberswede
Sep 2014
#432
Cyberswede already told you earlier that this is not a "HoF topic", did you not read her
seaglass
Sep 2014
#435
I do not have an optimistic feeling about this, seems overly interested in HoF for
seaglass
Sep 2014
#438
It's none of your business what Skinner does with his money, time and the internet.
L0oniX
Jan 2015
#441