Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should it be against the law, in the United States, to blaspheme or "insult a Deity"? [View all]NanceGreggs
(27,835 posts)95. So you're okay with ...
So what you're really saying is ...
So what you meant was ...
So what you truly believe is ...
Why don't you try addressing what people actually say, instead of pretending they said something different?
It's basic reading comprehension - you should try it sometime.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
302 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Should it be against the law, in the United States, to blaspheme or "insult a Deity"? [View all]
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
OP
Oh hey, I'm still waiting for the official list of "Religions Deemed "not real" by Nance".
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#17
Yes, we know all about your belief that scientologists aren't "real" religious folks.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#30
Yes, but we're discussing your need to question only one group of religious folks.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#44
You claimed their religion isn't real when they obviously think it is - that's offensive.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#51
No, it's not stupid at all. We should be able to criticize and mock any harmful ideology.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#78
I don't need your permission, although giving it seems to be "what gets you off".
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#100
What's your definition of "religion"? Is it possible it's subjective and impervious to your scorn?
cherokeeprogressive
May 2015
#31
Simple: Claiming that something ISN'T what someone else claims it IS.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2015
#158
I was made to believe that you were an Operating Thetan IV. Why the fuck were you auditing me?
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#266
The Evil Atheist Vermin Conspiracy's home office sent me out to investigate you.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#267
And that's only in this thread. There's heaps more peppered round DU...
Violet_Crumble
May 2015
#288
Imagine if one of us were to question the beliefs of muslims and claim their religion isn't "real".
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#34
Not all of them. I followed the Church of bluejuice until its sad demise last year...
Violet_Crumble
May 2015
#221
You feel like you're at FreeRepublic because you're protecting religion from its victims.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#97
The religious have well funded, hugely successful, coordinated attacks against MY fucking
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#106
Will do!! And you keep on wagging that finger thinking you're some moral arbiter.
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#116
We're being called intolerant for disrespecting religion and SHE feels like she's on FreeRepublic?
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#129
She'd say your beliefs weren't as worthy of respect as a "real" religion.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#133
No, Nance, telling folks to respect bigoted religious beliefs is a Republican thang.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#227
"everyone who has a religious faith should be free from being "mocked"
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#230
And it's the end result of your flailing around trying to paint me as the one in the wrong.
AlbertCat
May 2015
#236
Nance only wants people to criticize one group of religious believers.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#261
So mocking religion is the same thing as calling people "disgusting fatties"?
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#259
Keep hurling those straw men! Who said people are idiots for practicing their religion?
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#264
Why does religion get a Magical Superimpermeable Protective Holy Bubble?
Arugula Latte
May 2015
#179
Ikr? Why should women and lgbt people respect people who treat us like we're second class citizens?
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#188
Your need to protect the feelings of believers in misogynistic and homophobic sects is a bit strange
Arugula Latte
May 2015
#207
Riiiight -- I'm not a progressive because I think we should be free to criticize & satirize
Arugula Latte
May 2015
#242
If someone says "women are inferior because they came from Adam's rib" I am not
Arugula Latte
May 2015
#244
So in my example it is disrespectful of me to call out someone who says women are inferior
Arugula Latte
May 2015
#246
"adherence to religious beliefs is EXACTLY the same as adhering to political beliefs"
Warren Stupidity
May 2015
#235
Why is it decent to not offend people demanding to inflict their superstition on me?
backscatter712
May 2015
#59
LOL, so you are OK with people using religion to attack gays? Wow, you are fucking clueless....
Logical
May 2015
#81
You look silly on this topic. And refuse to address the direct question. Do you have an issue....
Logical
May 2015
#99
The pope just sent out priests to forgive women for having abortions.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#139
Their "sacred beliefs" include interfering with the autonomy of women and LGBT
PeaceNikki
May 2015
#83
Why should someone else's HATEFUL beliefs about others be respected?
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#93
Mocking people who thinks all gays go to hell is 100% ok, maybe you agree with the religion?? nt
Logical
May 2015
#194
say you are saying the holy books of the abrahamic faiths are "beyond ludicrous"?
Warren Stupidity
May 2015
#233
"leave those who adhere to a religious faith should be free to do so without ridicule"
Oktober
May 2015
#286
I dont even have time to insult the dainty doilies my doggie does doo-doo on.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#8
Absolutely it should be allowed. And some deities deserve to be insulted anyways.
Shoulders of Giants
May 2015
#9
I was just going to say that some people I know would have little to say, in that case.
libdem4life
May 2015
#35
Looking at the results of the poll, the answer to that question seems to be "no."
Chathamization
May 2015
#118
They have equal ambiguity about the definition of "sin", as well. Lots of "depends".
libdem4life
May 2015
#36
So blasphemy should only be legal if it doesn't provoke people to violence?
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#56
If i burn down a CVS because you mocked my belief in Leprechauns, are YOU the guilty one?
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#254
I keep reading in that supposedly magic book that gay sex insults a deity.
backscatter712
May 2015
#87
Well, i happen to think the 1st Amendment is pretty fucking important.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#176
Indispensable. At the same time we can say we will do almost anything including risk
NoJusticeNoPeace
May 2015
#255
Any ideology can be criticized. And mockery is a good tool to expose the silliness of religions.
Yorktown
May 2015
#155
And no one in the US government can give a rational explanation for our actions.
guillaumeb
May 2015
#280
Country music is an incestuous industry that censors non-conformists.
beam me up scottie
May 2015
#217
it is religions that produce the silliness we mock, and they do that in an astounding abundance. nt.
Warren Stupidity
May 2015
#234
"Only the road that is no road is long enough to go nowhere."--eridani-san, honored Duer.
panader0
May 2015
#127
Insulting a diety is not socially unacceptable. It's part and parcel of our culture
Bluenorthwest
May 2015
#161
Yeah, isn't it? Until recently, I wouldn't have thought to even ask it, not here.
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#193
I'm sure we'll get the "I'm sorry my accusations turned out to be BS" post any day now... N/T
Chathamization
May 2015
#275
No doubt, we're all all entitled to illustrate our character via valid satire...
LanternWaste
May 2015
#262
Hey, anything to counter the simplistic & omnipresent scolding and villifying of
Arugula Latte
May 2015
#285
While still others have been told no assistance because they were born on the wrong side of an imagi
LanternWaste
May 2015
#296
No, fictional supreme sky beings and their superstitious stories need insulting
Matrosov
May 2015
#265
I can think of no legal basis under which such speech could be criminalized. n/t
malthaussen
May 2015
#272
The people who had lists of decades-old scotus decisions to rationalize their arguments that
Warren DeMontague
May 2015
#299