Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The double-standard of making the poor prove they’re worthy of government benefits [View all]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2015/04/07/the-double-standard-of-making-poor-people-prove-theyre-worthy-of-government-benefits/But the logic behind the proposals is problematic in at least three, really big ways:
The first is economic: There's virtually no evidence that the poor actually spend their money this way. The idea that they do defies Maslow's hierarchy the notion that we all need shelter and food before we go in search of foot massages. In fact, the poor are much more savvy about how they spend their money because they have less of it (quick quiz: do you know exactly how much you last spent on a gallon of milk? or a bag of diapers?). By definition, a much higher share of their income often more than half of it is eaten up by basic housing costs than is true for the better-off, leaving them less money for luxuries anyway. And contrary to the logic of drug-testing laws, the poor are no more likely to use drugs than the population at large.
The second issue with these laws is a moral one: We rarely make similar demands of other recipients of government aid. We don't drug-test farmers who receive agriculture subsidies (lest they think about plowing while high!). We don't require Pell Grant recipients to prove that they're pursuing a degree that will get them a real job one day (sorry, no poetry!). We don't require wealthy families who cash in on the home mortgage interest deduction to prove that they don't use their homes as brothels (because surely someone out there does this). The strings that we attach to government aid are attached uniquely for the poor.
That leads us to the third problem, which is a political one. Many, many Americans who do receive these other kinds of government benefits farm subsidies, student loans, mortgage tax breaks don't recognize that, like the poor, they get something from government, too. That's because government gives money directly to poor people, but it gives benefits to the rest of us in ways that allow us to tell ourselves that we get nothing from government at all.
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The double-standard of making the poor prove they’re worthy of government benefits [View all]
gollygee
Apr 2016
OP
Getting the middle class to attack the poor instead of the rich is a winning strategy
Major Nikon
Apr 2016
#7
The small number that abuse the system get the press and encourage more restrictions.
FLPanhandle
Apr 2016
#8
I "love" the hot coffee lawsuit logic of tort reformers. "but she spilled coffee" - "yes but it was
MillennialDem
Apr 2016
#50
It's not as if right wing hatred of the poor is rooted in any sort of common sense...
MrScorpio
Apr 2016
#11
A divisive tactic used to take even more away from the poor...feeds into stereotypes as well.
Jefferson23
Apr 2016
#12
"Good Day?" It's between 8:30 and 12:30. The continental US is covered in darkness.
Algernon Moncrieff
Apr 2016
#33
If it helps I've seen Suburbanites of color that are just as bad, I've lived poor
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#55
And the point was that these legends play direcly to what the OP is saying
Algernon Moncrieff
Apr 2016
#62
"Every" seemed simpler than the more accurate "disturbingly pervasive"
Algernon Moncrieff
Apr 2016
#70
HELL, every congressman who serves at the state or fed level should be drug tested
FlatBaroque
Apr 2016
#53
So if a poor person gets a gift and pays rent with that gift and then uses his food card
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#37
Tax breaks need to be replaced with subsidies and grants. It would be more honest and simpler
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2016
#34
Wherever homeless are giving FREE HOUSING, overall costs go down a lot.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2016
#36
Thank you. There are no hard and fast rules, but simply giving housing to the homeless
JDPriestly
Apr 2016
#38
I would say it's a scam at work and should be illegal as well. I don't use drugs, so the only
MillennialDem
Apr 2016
#49
Because if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes true. The poor are spending their
MillennialDem
Apr 2016
#48
Teachings of Christianity. If someone is a victim, they are somehow at fault for their own
Amimnoch
Apr 2016
#72
The rich get more welfare dollarwise, they need daily drug testing.
Dont call me Shirley
Apr 2016
#73