Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Bradshaw3

(7,962 posts)

27. Doesn't confirm your characterization in the least

Reply to Dark n Stormy Knight (Reply #19)

Mon Dec 11, 2017, 11:01 PM

Dec 2017

You wrote that posters are writing that we should abandon Democratic women in Congress. They haven't and you can't admit you overstated. I understand why.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supporting Gillibrand, Harris, etc., while opposing Franken's resignation [View all] Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 OP

Well said!!! nt Trumpocalypse Dec 2017 #1

And to stand on principle, means denying someone Due Process ? Oh. Righty-o. OnDoutside Dec 2017 #2

Not standing on every principle at once, that's true. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #6

They had decided behind the scenes and among themselves that if another accuser comes Kirk Lover Dec 2017 #17

There are gray areas with many issues. BigmanPigman Dec 2017 #3

I agree with this completely. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #4

Who on this forum advocated "abandoning Democratic women in Congress"? Bradshaw3 Dec 2017 #5

You misinterpret that aspect of my post. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #8

I didn't misinterpret anything, just repeated what you wrote Bradshaw3 Dec 2017 #13

In rereading your reply, I feel even more strongly that you've misrepresented my meaning. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #12

I replied above Bradshaw3 Dec 2017 #14

Actually, the bolded part is extremely important to the meaning of my sentence. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #21

No the bolded part is a deflection Bradshaw3 Dec 2017 #25

I've seen plenty of posts of folks who want her OUT now. Kirk Lover Dec 2017 #18

According to some, you must be imaging that. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #19

There has been A TON...a shocking amount really and if I didn't trash all those threads I'd be glad Kirk Lover Dec 2017 #20

So you can't back it up because you have deleted them Bradshaw3 Dec 2017 #26

Doesn't confirm your characterization in the least Bradshaw3 Dec 2017 #27

No flame. I have many of your conflicts also. Living in riversedge Dec 2017 #7

I imagine there are many of us with these same conflicts. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #9

Al Franken was lynch mobbed and it is just SHIT and there are ZERO excuses for it! Period! LBM20 Dec 2017 #10

That's quite the exaggeration and insult to those who've actually been lynched. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #16

I will support ALL of them over any Republican. Their positions on the issues are an open page DFW Dec 2017 #11

Glad to hear that you'll support them against Rs. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #15

Agreed: it's complicated DFW Dec 2017 #23

I agree with most of what you say here. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #29

I would not support those who went after Al Franken in a primary, but of course in a general Demsrule86 Dec 2017 #32

Well done, no flames from me. sheshe2 Dec 2017 #22

Thanks, sheshe. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #28

Very thoughtful OP. Blue_true Dec 2017 #24

I've seen a lot of that, too. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #30

Maybe Leanne Tweeden was 'acting a version of herself on stage' dansolo Dec 2017 #31

Both of those can be true. Dark n Stormy Knight Dec 2017 #33