Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
2. Some of these banks were called repeat offenders in 2011 and still here we are again:
Sun May 24, 2015, 11:36 PM
May 2015
Promises Made, and Remade, by Firms in S.E.C. Fraud Cases
By EDWARD WYATTNOV. 7, 2011

WASHINGTON — When Citigroup agreed last month to pay $285 million to settle civil charges that it had defrauded customers during the housing bubble, the Securities and Exchange Commission wrested a typical pledge from the company: Citigroup would never violate one of the main antifraud provisions of the nation’s securities laws.

To an outsider, the vow may seem unusual. Citigroup, after all, was merely promising not to do something that the law already forbids. But that is the way the commission usually does business. It also was not the first time the firm was making that promise.

Citigroup’s main brokerage subsidiary, its predecessors or its parent company agreed not to violate the very same antifraud statute in July 2010. And in May 2006. Also as far as back as March 2005 and April 2000.

Citigroup is far from the only such repeat offender — in the eyes of the S.E.C. — on Wall Street. Nearly all of the biggest financial companies, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America among them, have settled fraud cases by promising the S.E.C. that they would never again violate an antifraud law, only to do it again in another case a few years later.

full article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/business/in-sec-fraud-cases-banks-make-and-break-promises.html?_r=0

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

and an investigation into why Obama's legal eagles send no bankers to jail nt msongs May 2015 #1
Some of these banks were called repeat offenders in 2011 and still here we are again: think May 2015 #2
$285 million is a drop in the bucket davidpdx May 2015 #11
Everyone knows why PSPS May 2015 #3
This is the kind of thing I want candidates to be asked if they agree with. For ANY office! n/t arcane1 May 2015 #4
It sure is. Should banks be held accountable for repeatedly violating antitrust laws? think May 2015 #5
Go Elizabeth Go! SoapBox May 2015 #6
Off With Their Heads! markmyword May 2015 #7
My personal favorite is this: Moostache May 2015 #8
Oh man, that is awesome! I'm liking this site! trillion May 2015 #12
The media tells the prolls they need to love Wall Street for their own retirement.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #9
A criminal conspiracy on a massive scale nd the Rico Act Ichingcarpenter May 2015 #10
Thought headline said 'public hangings'. nt Mnemosyne May 2015 #13
Hey, Jamie! Bring the cufflinks. Octafish May 2015 #14
Some first class bling there. Just where does one get a pair of those? think May 2015 #18
A new Pecora Commission would be nice. MannyGoldstein May 2015 #15
My lack of historical knowledge forces me once again to use the Google thing. think May 2015 #17
Reading about these banks in The Big Short (Lewis) - same crooksters as in the last decade erronis May 2015 #16
What is wrong with this statement? LiberalLovinLug May 2015 #19
corporate screwups chev52 May 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Elizabeth Warren is calli...»Reply #2