Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
17. My lack of historical knowledge forces me once again to use the Google thing.
Mon May 25, 2015, 11:27 AM
May 2015

Amazing that one name from that investigation is still in the thick of things under it's new name.

Pecora Commission

The Pecora Investigation was an inquiry begun on March 4, 1932 by the United States Senate Committee on Banking and Currency to investigate the causes of the Wall Street Crash of 1929. The name refers to the fourth and final chief counsel for the investigation, Ferdinand Pecora.

The investigation was launched by a majority-Republican Senate, under the Banking Committee's chairman, Senator Peter Norbeck. Hearings began on April 11, 1932, but were criticized by Democratic Party members and their supporters as being little more than an attempt by the Republicans to appease the growing demands of an angry American public suffering through the Great Depression. Two chief counsels were fired for ineffectiveness, and a third resigned after the committee refused to give him broad subpoena power. In January 1933, Ferdinand Pecora, an assistant district attorney for New York County was hired to write the final report. Discovering that the investigation was incomplete, Pecora requested permission to hold an additional month of hearings. His exposé of the National City Bank (now Citibank) made banner headlines and caused the bank's president to resign. Democrats had won the majority in the Senate, and the new President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, urged the new Democratic chairman of the Banking Committee, Senator Duncan U. Fletcher, to let Pecora continue the probe. So actively did Pecora pursue the investigation that his name became publicly identified with it, rather than the committee's chairman.

Following the 1929 Wall Street Crash, the U.S. economy had gone into a depression, and a large number of banks failed. The Pecora Investigation sought to uncover the causes of the financial collapse. As chief counsel, Ferdinand Pecora personally examined many high-profile witnesses, who included some of the nation's most influential bankers and stockbrokers. Among these witnesses were Richard Whitney, president of the New York Stock Exchange, investment bankers Otto H. Kahn, Charles E. Mitchell, Thomas W. Lamont, and Albert H. Wiggin, plus celebrated commodity market speculators such as Arthur W. Cutten. Given wide media coverage, the testimony of the powerful banker J.P. Morgan, Jr. caused a public outcry after he admitted under examination that he and many of his partners had not paid any income taxes in 1931 and 1932.

~Snip~

In 1939 Ferdinand Pecora published a memoir that recounted details of the investigations, Wall Street Under Oath. Pecora wrote: "Bitterly hostile was Wall Street to the enactment of the regulatory legislation." As to disclosure rules, he stated that "Had there been full disclosure of what was being done in furtherance of these schemes, they could not long have survived the fierce light of publicity and criticism. Legal chicanery and pitch darkness were the banker's stoutest allies."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pecora_Commission

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

and an investigation into why Obama's legal eagles send no bankers to jail nt msongs May 2015 #1
Some of these banks were called repeat offenders in 2011 and still here we are again: think May 2015 #2
$285 million is a drop in the bucket davidpdx May 2015 #11
Everyone knows why PSPS May 2015 #3
This is the kind of thing I want candidates to be asked if they agree with. For ANY office! n/t arcane1 May 2015 #4
It sure is. Should banks be held accountable for repeatedly violating antitrust laws? think May 2015 #5
Go Elizabeth Go! SoapBox May 2015 #6
Off With Their Heads! markmyword May 2015 #7
My personal favorite is this: Moostache May 2015 #8
Oh man, that is awesome! I'm liking this site! trillion May 2015 #12
The media tells the prolls they need to love Wall Street for their own retirement.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2015 #9
A criminal conspiracy on a massive scale nd the Rico Act Ichingcarpenter May 2015 #10
Thought headline said 'public hangings'. nt Mnemosyne May 2015 #13
Hey, Jamie! Bring the cufflinks. Octafish May 2015 #14
Some first class bling there. Just where does one get a pair of those? think May 2015 #18
A new Pecora Commission would be nice. MannyGoldstein May 2015 #15
My lack of historical knowledge forces me once again to use the Google thing. think May 2015 #17
Reading about these banks in The Big Short (Lewis) - same crooksters as in the last decade erronis May 2015 #16
What is wrong with this statement? LiberalLovinLug May 2015 #19
corporate screwups chev52 May 2015 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Elizabeth Warren is calli...»Reply #17