Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Religious parents want Harry Potter banned from the classroom because it 'glorifies witchcraft' [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(102,693 posts)44. There was a recent court ruling that the RE exam was unfairly excluding non-religious views
Education secretary made error of law on new religious studies GCSE high court
Parents challenging the governments new religious studies GCSE, which they say relegates non-religious worldviews, have welcomed a high court ruling in their favour.
Mr Justice Warby said the education secretary, Nicky Morgan, had erred in asserting that the GCSE, due to come into effect in September next year, would fulfil the entirety of the states RE [religious education] duties.
That assertion was, he said, in breach of the governments duty to ensure that the wider school curriculum ensured knowledge was conveyed in a pluralistic manner, and information was given about atheism and other non-religious viewpoints.
The ruling was a victory for three families, supported by the British Humanist Association (BHA), who claimed Morgan had taken a skewed approach and was failing to reflect in schools the pluralistic nature of the UK.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/nov/25/education-secretary-made-error-of-law-on-new-religious-studies-gcse-high-court
Parents challenging the governments new religious studies GCSE, which they say relegates non-religious worldviews, have welcomed a high court ruling in their favour.
Mr Justice Warby said the education secretary, Nicky Morgan, had erred in asserting that the GCSE, due to come into effect in September next year, would fulfil the entirety of the states RE [religious education] duties.
That assertion was, he said, in breach of the governments duty to ensure that the wider school curriculum ensured knowledge was conveyed in a pluralistic manner, and information was given about atheism and other non-religious viewpoints.
The ruling was a victory for three families, supported by the British Humanist Association (BHA), who claimed Morgan had taken a skewed approach and was failing to reflect in schools the pluralistic nature of the UK.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/nov/25/education-secretary-made-error-of-law-on-new-religious-studies-gcse-high-court
Which makes me think the head-teachers who say in the article 'oh well, use something other than Harry Potter, to keep the fundamentalists quiet' are doing a bad job.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Religious parents want Harry Potter banned from the classroom because it 'glorifies witchcraft' [View all]
w0nderer
Dec 2015
OP
Don't even ask about Hallowe'en. I still can't look a Jack O'Lantern in the hole for his eye.
merrily
Dec 2015
#1
Nothing that interesting, I fear. It's just that religious fundamentalists of all stripes
merrily
Dec 2015
#41
Any idea why these people were pointing out a cross dresser to you or to the "security guard?"
merrily
Dec 2015
#49
No reason to teach Harry Potter in school. Nothing phenomenal about that series.
merrily
Dec 2015
#3
I don't think she is still reading Harry Potter (nor is Rowling still writing the series.)
merrily
Dec 2015
#54
If that's the case, they better also ban the Bible. Seas parting and all that witchy stuff . . .
Vinca
Dec 2015
#8
I've long been disappointed that the traditional artistic depiction of angels
cemaphonic
Dec 2015
#66
Damn, the US is slipping. The religious crackpots will try to outdo this one. n/t
RKP5637
Dec 2015
#29
There was a recent court ruling that the RE exam was unfairly excluding non-religious views
muriel_volestrangler
Dec 2015
#44
So if I keep practicing saying Alohomora, I really will be able to unlock things?
tanyev
Dec 2015
#14
Harry Potter is a lot less dangerous than what many pastors preach and brainwash flocks with. n/t
RKP5637
Dec 2015
#30
Well said! Christians, so many twisted and evil. Generally when some get up and start talking
RKP5637
Dec 2015
#42
I sure hope the "Oz" books and the "Mary Poppins" books are included in the ban.
Coventina
Dec 2015
#31
Exactly, religious wars in the name of their god. I recall in my youth in church singing
RKP5637
Dec 2015
#45
I guess someone has a hard time understanding Dumbledore's very simple message...
all american girl
Dec 2015
#59
I thought the "fundies being ascared of Harry Potter" thing was last decade?
cemaphonic
Dec 2015
#82