Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trudyco

(1,258 posts)
44. Our caucus was very democratic, except it was closed.
Tue May 24, 2016, 01:22 PM
May 2016

Not many youngsters in my precinct. Not many in the whole school where numerous precincts caucusing were held simultaneously. Very, very strong Bernie Sanders votes. But I would absolutely welcome investigation of any primary. The statistics are showing fraud and they are showing in Pima county Arizona to be in early voting vote counting if I understand the math right. How did you feel about the 2004 vote counting msongs?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sure Bernie, as long as you pay for it. You won't get my KY tax money for it. leftofcool May 2016 #1
I guess you didn't read the linked article catnhatnh May 2016 #7
I'm so pleased that Bernie is demanding a review because in 2004 JDPriestly May 2016 #33
True - but how could he possibly? forest444 May 2016 #74
When you think there is nothing to do, you keep doing -- quietly JDPriestly May 2016 #75
Thou art a braver soul than I, JD. forest444 May 2016 #76
Concur - Never give up - Never surrender laserhaas May 2016 #89
Oh, yes, he will get your KY tax money. frylock May 2016 #79
All right. Finally challenging DNC shenanigans. JudyM May 2016 #2
Bernie taking his gloves off. * sigh of relief* Betty Karlson May 2016 #63
At those numbers I would expect that to be sharp_stick May 2016 #3
What is the point? I mean seriously? Will this change the election? No. Laser102 May 2016 #4
More taxpayer and party money, down the drain. Just send it to Donald Trump, sore losers. nt onehandle May 2016 #5
Clintons waste billions of taxpayer dollars...deregulation, wars, scandals Cosmic Kitten May 2016 #12
no, they care about one liners and calling all Bernie supporters losers retrowire May 2016 #19
None of those scandals to my knowledge... CherokeeDem May 2016 #20
Maybe you need to start reading up on Haiti and the Clintons trudyco May 2016 #25
I've read all that.... CherokeeDem May 2016 #27
You are correct. Nothing has been proven yet. trudyco May 2016 #55
Sex in the Oval Office with an intern should be enough for impeachment left-of-center2012 May 2016 #29
We who support Bernie support him because of his personal JDPriestly May 2016 #36
your republican congress had a lot to do with that MyNameGoesHere May 2016 #52
What if Sanders really won Kentucky and not Clinton? PufPuf23 May 2016 #65
Awesome. blackspade May 2016 #6
Oh for fuck's sake. Theres less than a fraction of one delegate Gman May 2016 #8
Offs. How does a recount for delegates elect Trump? askeptic May 2016 #11
No matter the outcome of the vote recount Gman May 2016 #13
Oh for fuck's sake... election integrity much??? Cosmic Kitten May 2016 #14
Wrong answer Gman May 2016 #15
If you can see past your nose trudyco May 2016 #37
No, Bernie supporters couldn't care less about the emails or election integrity Gman May 2016 #87
Sounds like the friends-of-Hillary are afraid of the recount result. JDPriestly May 2016 #38
Deathly afraid of losing Gman May 2016 #43
so you admit it GreatGazoo May 2016 #50
LMAO! Gman May 2016 #62
Per the OP--the state---aka -the KY taxpayer will foot the bill for Sanders ego trip. riversedge May 2016 #54
Didn't independent voters in the state foot the bill for your closed primaries? frylock May 2016 #80
That's A Bit Dramatic billhicks76 May 2016 #58
No, it trumps nothing Gman May 2016 #86
Well Your Opinion Is Even Lamer billhicks76 May 2016 #91
Hallaryites afraid of fair election? askeptic May 2016 #9
No. That's nothing but redirection and won't work Gman May 2016 #16
It's not over according to the AP askeptic May 2016 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #18
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #34
Good! Duval May 2016 #17
With a total that close LittleGirl May 2016 #21
I thought it was automatic also. If it isn't, it should be automatic. It is important bbgrunt May 2016 #24
In a close election where one wins the office and one goes home . . . brush May 2016 #32
The point is the one delegate. I thought that was obvious? JonLeibowitz May 2016 #35
Did you leave off the sarcasm gif? brush May 2016 #64
It's Hillary who is acting like, as LBJ used to say, a "nervous Nellie" JDPriestly May 2016 #42
Way to turn logic on it's head brush May 2016 #67
well said. LittleGirl May 2016 #90
What a waste of taxpayer money! SunSeeker May 2016 #23
Wonderful!!!! Wonderful!!!! I can't believe it!! Stevepol May 2016 #26
It's less than that. Igel May 2016 #77
Thanks for reminding me. I misunderstood what re-canvassing is for. Stevepol May 2016 #83
I don't know what a recount would cost but funds would be plentiful lostnfound May 2016 #84
Ego out of control...makes no difference on delegates...sanders on beachbumbob May 2016 #28
every primary and undemocratic caucus bernie won should be investigated for fraud on his part nt msongs May 2016 #30
Our caucus was very democratic, except it was closed. trudyco May 2016 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #31
So you only want to look at places Sanders lost. Typical. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #45
And yet you only list elections Sanders lost. nt SunSeeker May 2016 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #56
states where the Sanders machine strikes fear in the hearts of political ladder monkeys, states like reddread May 2016 #69
This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #73
None are "in question" except by the Sanders campaign. SunSeeker May 2016 #78
Amazing that FlaGranny May 2016 #39
Yeah, kind of depressing trudyco May 2016 #46
if they admit shenanigans they'll have to admit Katherine Harris, and then they can't scream NADER MisterP May 2016 #61
It's nauseating that they really don't care lostnfound May 2016 #85
especially considering DU was created as a response to 2000 election fraud (move along) nashville_brook May 2016 #93
If Bernie WINS he will pick up ONE delegate. RealAmericanDem May 2016 #40
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #47
I think you forgot the sarcasm smilie. Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #49
So it's about honest vote counting for most of us happy to hear this news. trudyco May 2016 #53
A recanvas is a review of the voting totals, sort of like checking your receipt in a restaurant Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #51
Curious Comments pmorlan1 May 2016 #57
Lots and lots of bleating about taxes. frylock May 2016 #81
Sore loser. eom MohRokTah May 2016 #59
Bernie or Bust ! urbuddha May 2016 #60
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah! Cryptoad May 2016 #66
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #68
If it is so expensive that Hills and her cheerleaders aspirant May 2016 #70
Fine bunch of Democrats we make. Sore Loser??? Tom Rinaldo May 2016 #71
What will Sanders' team do if the vote actually swings more toward Clinton? jmowreader May 2016 #72
If the final count is accurate FlaGranny May 2016 #92
good luck auditing an electronic machine flashsmith99 May 2016 #82
Dam Straight - laserhaas May 2016 #88
He can try Douseeme May 2016 #94
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sanders campaign requests...»Reply #44