Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,599 posts)
21. So we have laws against them
Wed Mar 15, 2017, 11:51 AM
Mar 2017

Tax money goes to training folks on details of the laws and their enforcement. Since these are registered items, tax money goes to maintain the database. Presumably people have been charged and convicted for violating those related laws. Tax money pays for the enforcement, due process and punishment of the violators.

Without the firearm attached a suppressor, IMO, is singularly ill designed for use as a weapon and certainly not more lethal than a standard piece of pipe or other blunt object.

The price of these items varies. I'm not seeing that adding $200 to that price and wait of 7-10 months will make them better or safer in any way.

The ATF restriction makes even less sense that most of the war on drugs or building the trump wall.

Waste is waste and as bad as it is to spend money for nothing, punishing someone for owning safety equipment is insane.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More of the Republican pro-death position.... n/t DFW Mar 2017 #1
"Silencers" are not deadly. former9thward Mar 2017 #2
Imaginative straw man, cupcake. LanternWaste Mar 2017 #5
Where is the "straw man" in that post? Marengo Mar 2017 #8
Who's the "cupcake"? djg21 Mar 2017 #24
It does seem odd and rather out of place. I wonder what prompted the selection of that word? Marengo Mar 2017 #28
And they make your gun look way cooler than ear muffs, right? Paladin Mar 2017 #6
Well certainly less compact, you know, more difficult to conceal... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #12
Well, if by "cooler" you mean ManiacJoe Mar 2017 #17
Engineering controls for sound are far preferred over personal protective equipment. former9thward Mar 2017 #18
Some people watch movies and believe what they see. NWCorona Mar 2017 #3
If somebody shoots around me I like to know where it is coming from hollowdweller Mar 2017 #4
Suppressors don't appear to be used much in mass shootings where they are more easily obtained Marengo Mar 2017 #9
Yet hollowdweller Mar 2017 #13
Were they used in the Charlie Hebdo and 11/13 Paris attacks? I had not seen it reported if... Marengo Mar 2017 #25
re: "I've had people hunting near me and I couldn't tell it was them when they shot..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #11
No hollowdweller Mar 2017 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #15
It's relatively easy to make a suppressor. Kaleva Mar 2017 #23
Looking forward to getting one for my 22 pistol & rifle once this passes. Skeeter Barnes Mar 2017 #7
There is no purpose to restricting them n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #10
Best wishes to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand. Hope good sense and morality will prevail. n/t Judi Lynn Mar 2017 #16
Are suppressors immoral? Marengo Mar 2017 #27
And once again, "gun control as religious belief" is demonstrated for all to see... friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #30
There are already hundreds of thousands of suppressors in civilian hands now NickB79 Mar 2017 #19
So we have laws against them discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #21
Just give me a reason to get a SP-01 tactical. ileus Mar 2017 #20
I'm torn. It would make the neighborhood quieter when the asshole out back decides to play Rambo. Vinca Mar 2017 #22
Another legislator who thinks hollywood's 'pfut' is real. X_Digger Mar 2017 #26
Gunner bait. maxsolomon Mar 2017 #29
If she didn't, Schumer would find someone to primary her derby378 Mar 2017 #31
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand v...»Reply #21