Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: UN seeks immunity for UNRWA employees complicit in Oct. 7 massacre - Channel 12 report [View all]Beastly Boy
(11,174 posts)35. Yes they do.
Do you not understand that the UN is not bound by any rules of the US Department of Justice, or any bills passed by the US Congress, or any codes of conduct in any office, department or other body of the US government?
Why do you even bother to cite them? Deflecting again?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
UN seeks immunity for UNRWA employees complicit in Oct. 7 massacre - Channel 12 report [View all]
Beastly Boy
Sep 22
OP
There will be rallies in support of the criminals in Teheran and Columbia University.
Beastly Boy
Sep 22
#2
They just got started back then. They didn't learn yet how to do things wrong.
Beastly Boy
Sep 22
#14
The UN is the defendant in this case. The hostage families are the plaintiffs.
Beastly Boy
Sep 22
#11
UNRWA is being sued for the damages the terrorists did wheb they vwere employed
Beastly Boy
Sep 22
#44
The validity or legality of the instrument of immunity afforded to the UN is not in dispute here.
Beastly Boy
Sep 23
#51
The immunity clause in the UN founding charter is absolute, and so is the UN discretion in using it.
Beastly Boy
Sep 23
#54
Disgusting. The UN was created to prevent wars, not protect and enable terrorists.
SunSeeker
Sep 22
#7