Latest Breaking News

Eko

(8,495 posts)

40. The UNRWA employees complicit in Oct. 7 massacre were fired.

Sun Sep 22, 2024, 06:58 PM

Sep 22

They no longer work for the UN so don't enjoy protections given by them. Nowhere does the UN claim the fired employees have immunity either. The headline is a lie as well as the claims in this post that
:This is UNRWA openly acknowledging their complicity in massacres and hostage taking of Oct. 7, 2023.
:Think about it: This is the United Nations demanding protection for international war criminals.
Post should be deleted.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

UN seeks immunity for UNRWA employees complicit in Oct. 7 massacre - Channel 12 report [View all] Beastly Boy Sep 22 OP

Shameless and despicable. MyMission Sep 22 #1

There will be rallies in support of the criminals in Teheran and Columbia University. Beastly Boy Sep 22 #2

Yup nycbos Sep 22 #4

My favorite part... jvill Sep 22 #8

Useful idiots JoseBalow Sep 22 #13

Given the opportunity, The United Nations will always do the wrong thing. madaboutharry Sep 22 #3

Like when the UN supported the creation of Israel? jvill Sep 22 #9

That was a one off. madaboutharry Sep 22 #12

They just got started back then. They didn't learn yet how to do things wrong. Beastly Boy Sep 22 #14

77 years ago MichMan Sep 22 #16

Something about this report from the JP is confusing. moniss Sep 22 #5

The UN is the defendant in this case. The hostage families are the plaintiffs. Beastly Boy Sep 22 #11

It was reported that the individuals moniss Sep 22 #39

UNRWA is being sued for the damages the terrorists did wheb they vwere employed Beastly Boy Sep 22 #44

Nobody disputes that the document was filed moniss Sep 22 #48

The validity or legality of the instrument of immunity afforded to the UN is not in dispute here. Beastly Boy Sep 23 #51

You do realize that the people in question could sue the UN for moniss Sep 23 #53

The immunity clause in the UN founding charter is absolute, and so is the UN discretion in using it. Beastly Boy Sep 23 #54

You can sue for anything. It doesn't mean you will win moniss Sep 23 #57

Once again, any lawsuit against the UN has a predetermined outcome. Beastly Boy Sep 23 #59

I have addressed the issue and I have moniss Sep 23 #60

This is outrageous! mcar Sep 22 #6

Disgusting. The UN was created to prevent wars, not protect and enable terrorists. SunSeeker Sep 22 #7

That does not sound right RainCaster Sep 22 #10

What a switch sarisataka Sep 22 #15

UNRWA was hijacked by Palestinians long ago. It is a wing of Hamas. elias7 Sep 22 #17

Uh, no. Eko Sep 22 #18

If the organization is providing cover for terrorists.... Mysterian Sep 22 #19

How are they providing cover for terrorists? Eko Sep 22 #20

Allowing terrorists to operate undercover as "UNRWA workers" Mysterian Sep 22 #21

Uh, they fired them. Eko Sep 22 #22

You're extremely naive if you believe those are the only ones Mysterian Sep 22 #23

So if they fired them how are they providing cover for them? Eko Sep 22 #24

The ones they didn't fire still working in the org Mysterian Sep 22 #25

This is what you think Eko Sep 22 #26

And you think UNRWA has completely cleansed itself of Hamas operatives Mysterian Sep 23 #49

See post 55 Eko Sep 23 #56

You have yet to show that it is providing cover for terrorists. Eko Sep 22 #29

Known fact: There were Hamas operatives operating under cover as UNRWA workers Mysterian Sep 23 #50

That is what Israel claimed orally to UNRWA that there were Hamas operatives working at UNRWA. Eko Sep 23 #55

Ahhhhh, they just fired them for no reason Mysterian Sep 23 #58

I never claimed that Eko Sep 23 #61

UNRWA has been completely infiltrated by top Hamas operatives Mysterian Sep 30 #62

From your article. Eko Sep 30 #63

Uh, yes Beastly Boy Sep 22 #28

Look up the definition of an Organization. Eko Sep 22 #30

Another wild goose chase? No thanks. Beastly Boy Sep 22 #31

Do you not understand that if an organization has immunity Eko Sep 22 #32

The UN, and the US Department of Justice disagree with you. Beastly Boy Sep 22 #33

No they dont. Eko Sep 22 #34

Yes they do. Beastly Boy Sep 22 #35

To show you another example of immunity. Eko Sep 22 #37

And why would you think UNRWA employees are not their representatives Beastly Boy Sep 22 #42

We have gone over this. Eko Sep 22 #43

Tell that to the UN. Beastly Boy Sep 22 #46

To the fired people? Eko Sep 22 #47

And my post was in response to this from you. Eko Sep 22 #38

What do the UN and DOJ disagree with you on? Beastly Boy Sep 22 #41

Where did I say that the UN and the DOJ disagree with me? Eko Sep 22 #45

Interesting thing about the Jerusalem Post. Eko Sep 22 #27

Not surprising. EllieBC Sep 22 #36

The UNRWA employees complicit in Oct. 7 massacre were fired. Eko Sep 22 #40

Nope. Happy Hoosier Sep 23 #52

One less immunity needed sarisataka Sep 30 #64