Latest Breaking News

Beastly Boy

(11,659 posts)

44. UNRWA is being sued for the damages the terrorists did wheb they vwere employed

Sun Sep 22, 2024, 07:15 PM

Sep 2024

by UNRWA. Any subsequent action of UNRWA, inadequate in the context of the crime as it was, plays no role in UN extending immunity to the criminals. The fact that some of them were fired points to their culpability, but doesn't make them accountable for their crimes.

And the idea is that the UN flipped the finger in regard to the criminals being sued. UN extended immnunity from prosecution to them, and that is beyond dispute.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

UN seeks immunity for UNRWA employees complicit in Oct. 7 massacre - Channel 12 report [View all] Beastly Boy Sep 2024 OP

Shameless and despicable. MyMission Sep 2024 #1

There will be rallies in support of the criminals in Teheran and Columbia University. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #2

Yup nycbos Sep 2024 #4

My favorite part... jvill Sep 2024 #8

Useful idiots JoseBalow Sep 2024 #13

Given the opportunity, The United Nations will always do the wrong thing. madaboutharry Sep 2024 #3

Like when the UN supported the creation of Israel? jvill Sep 2024 #9

That was a one off. madaboutharry Sep 2024 #12

They just got started back then. They didn't learn yet how to do things wrong. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #14

77 years ago MichMan Sep 2024 #16

Something about this report from the JP is confusing. moniss Sep 2024 #5

The UN is the defendant in this case. The hostage families are the plaintiffs. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #11

It was reported that the individuals moniss Sep 2024 #39

UNRWA is being sued for the damages the terrorists did wheb they vwere employed Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #44

Nobody disputes that the document was filed moniss Sep 2024 #48

The validity or legality of the instrument of immunity afforded to the UN is not in dispute here. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #51

You do realize that the people in question could sue the UN for moniss Sep 2024 #53

The immunity clause in the UN founding charter is absolute, and so is the UN discretion in using it. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #54

You can sue for anything. It doesn't mean you will win moniss Sep 2024 #57

Once again, any lawsuit against the UN has a predetermined outcome. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #59

I have addressed the issue and I have moniss Sep 2024 #60

This is outrageous! mcar Sep 2024 #6

Disgusting. The UN was created to prevent wars, not protect and enable terrorists. SunSeeker Sep 2024 #7

That does not sound right RainCaster Sep 2024 #10

What a switch sarisataka Sep 2024 #15

UNRWA was hijacked by Palestinians long ago. It is a wing of Hamas. elias7 Sep 2024 #17

Uh, no. Eko Sep 2024 #18

If the organization is providing cover for terrorists.... Mysterian Sep 2024 #19

How are they providing cover for terrorists? Eko Sep 2024 #20

Allowing terrorists to operate undercover as "UNRWA workers" Mysterian Sep 2024 #21

Uh, they fired them. Eko Sep 2024 #22

You're extremely naive if you believe those are the only ones Mysterian Sep 2024 #23

So if they fired them how are they providing cover for them? Eko Sep 2024 #24

The ones they didn't fire still working in the org Mysterian Sep 2024 #25

This is what you think Eko Sep 2024 #26

And you think UNRWA has completely cleansed itself of Hamas operatives Mysterian Sep 2024 #49

See post 55 Eko Sep 2024 #56

You have yet to show that it is providing cover for terrorists. Eko Sep 2024 #29

Known fact: There were Hamas operatives operating under cover as UNRWA workers Mysterian Sep 2024 #50

That is what Israel claimed orally to UNRWA that there were Hamas operatives working at UNRWA. Eko Sep 2024 #55

Ahhhhh, they just fired them for no reason Mysterian Sep 2024 #58

I never claimed that Eko Sep 2024 #61

UNRWA has been completely infiltrated by top Hamas operatives Mysterian Sep 2024 #62

From your article. Eko Sep 2024 #63

Uh, yes Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #28

Look up the definition of an Organization. Eko Sep 2024 #30

Another wild goose chase? No thanks. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #31

Do you not understand that if an organization has immunity Eko Sep 2024 #32

The UN, and the US Department of Justice disagree with you. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #33

No they dont. Eko Sep 2024 #34

Yes they do. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #35

To show you another example of immunity. Eko Sep 2024 #37

And why would you think UNRWA employees are not their representatives Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #42

We have gone over this. Eko Sep 2024 #43

Tell that to the UN. Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #46

To the fired people? Eko Sep 2024 #47

And my post was in response to this from you. Eko Sep 2024 #38

What do the UN and DOJ disagree with you on? Beastly Boy Sep 2024 #41

Where did I say that the UN and the DOJ disagree with me? Eko Sep 2024 #45

Interesting thing about the Jerusalem Post. Eko Sep 2024 #27

Not surprising. EllieBC Sep 2024 #36

The UNRWA employees complicit in Oct. 7 massacre were fired. Eko Sep 2024 #40

Nope. Happy Hoosier Sep 2024 #52

One less immunity needed sarisataka Sep 2024 #64