Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Democrats suspect Netanyahu attempting to tilt Trump-Harris race [View all]ancianita
(38,516 posts)60. Yes.
Criticisms of AIPAC as a tool of Likud members in Israel are making the rounds.
AIPAC itself insists that its history and leaders speak for it.
More on AIPAC, and an excerpt (editing out source numbers for readability) that shows a few Democratic leaders' historical connections to it...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIPAC
...In 1959, AZCPA was renamed the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, reflecting a broader membership and mission. [Isaiah L.] Kenen led the organization until his retirement in 1974, when he was succeeded by Morris J. Amitay. According to commentator M.J. Rosenberg, Kenen was "an old-fashioned liberal," who did not seek to win support by donating to campaigns or otherwise influencing elections, but was willing to "play with the hand that is dealt to us."
Rise (1970s to 1980s)
By the 1970s, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and AIPAC had assumed overall responsibility for Israel-related lobbying within the Jewish communal landscape.
The Conference of Presidents was responsible for speaking to the Executive Branch of the U.S. government, while AIPAC dealt mainly with the Legislative Branch.
Although it had worked effectively behind the scenes since its founding in 1953, AIPAC only became a powerful organization in the 15 years after the Yom Kippur War in 1973.
By the mid-70s, AIPAC had achieved the financial and political clout necessary to sway congressional opinion, according to historian Michael Oren. During this period, AIPAC's budget soared from $300,000 in 1973 to over $7 million during its peak years of influence in the late 1980s.
Whereas Kenen had come out of the Zionist movement, with early staff pulled from the longtime activists among the Jewish community, AIPAC had evolved into a prototypical Washington-based lobbying and consulting firm. Leaders and staffers were recruited from legislative staff and lobbyists with direct experience with the federal bureaucracy.Confronted with opposition from both houses of Congress, United States President Gerald Ford rescinded his 'reassessment.'"
George Lenczowski notes a similar, mid-1970s timeframe for the rise of AIPAC power: "It [the Jimmy Carter presidency] also coincides with the militant emergence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) as a major force in shaping American policy toward the Middle East."..
...AIPAC scored two major victories in the early 1980s that established its image among political candidates as an organization "not to be trifled with" and set the pace for "a staunchly pro-Israel" Congress over the next three decades.
In 1982, activists affiliated with AIPAC in Skokie, Illinois, backed Richard J. Durbin to oust U.S. Representative Paul Findley (R-Illinois), who had shown enthusiasm for PLO leader Yasir Arafat.
In 1984, Senator Charles H. Percy (R-Illinois), then-chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a supporter of a deal to allow Saudi Arabia to buy sophisticated airborne early warning and control (AWAC) military planes was defeated by Democrat Paul Simon.
Simon was asked by Robert Asher, an AIPAC board member in Chicago, to run against Percy...
----- fast forward --
In February 2019, freshman U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota), one of the first two Muslim women (along with Rashida Tlaib) to serve in Congress, tweeted that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's (R-California) support for Israel was all about the Benjamins (i.e. about the money). The next day, she clarified that she meant AIPAC.
Omar later apologized but also made another statement attacking "political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country. The statements aroused anger among AIPAC supporters, but also vocal support among the progressive wing of the Democratic Party and "revived a fraught debate" in American politics over whether AIPAC has too much influence over American policy in the Middle East, while highlighting the deterioration of some relationships between progressive Democrats and pro-Israel organizations.
On March 6, 2019, the Democratic leadership put forth a resolution on the House floor condemning anti-Semitism, which was broadened to condemn bigotry against a wide variety of groups before it passed on March 7....
Rise (1970s to 1980s)
By the 1970s, the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations and AIPAC had assumed overall responsibility for Israel-related lobbying within the Jewish communal landscape.
The Conference of Presidents was responsible for speaking to the Executive Branch of the U.S. government, while AIPAC dealt mainly with the Legislative Branch.
Although it had worked effectively behind the scenes since its founding in 1953, AIPAC only became a powerful organization in the 15 years after the Yom Kippur War in 1973.
By the mid-70s, AIPAC had achieved the financial and political clout necessary to sway congressional opinion, according to historian Michael Oren. During this period, AIPAC's budget soared from $300,000 in 1973 to over $7 million during its peak years of influence in the late 1980s.
Whereas Kenen had come out of the Zionist movement, with early staff pulled from the longtime activists among the Jewish community, AIPAC had evolved into a prototypical Washington-based lobbying and consulting firm. Leaders and staffers were recruited from legislative staff and lobbyists with direct experience with the federal bureaucracy.Confronted with opposition from both houses of Congress, United States President Gerald Ford rescinded his 'reassessment.'"
George Lenczowski notes a similar, mid-1970s timeframe for the rise of AIPAC power: "It [the Jimmy Carter presidency] also coincides with the militant emergence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) as a major force in shaping American policy toward the Middle East."..
...AIPAC scored two major victories in the early 1980s that established its image among political candidates as an organization "not to be trifled with" and set the pace for "a staunchly pro-Israel" Congress over the next three decades.
In 1982, activists affiliated with AIPAC in Skokie, Illinois, backed Richard J. Durbin to oust U.S. Representative Paul Findley (R-Illinois), who had shown enthusiasm for PLO leader Yasir Arafat.
In 1984, Senator Charles H. Percy (R-Illinois), then-chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a supporter of a deal to allow Saudi Arabia to buy sophisticated airborne early warning and control (AWAC) military planes was defeated by Democrat Paul Simon.
Simon was asked by Robert Asher, an AIPAC board member in Chicago, to run against Percy...
----- fast forward --
In February 2019, freshman U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar (D-Minnesota), one of the first two Muslim women (along with Rashida Tlaib) to serve in Congress, tweeted that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's (R-California) support for Israel was all about the Benjamins (i.e. about the money). The next day, she clarified that she meant AIPAC.
Omar later apologized but also made another statement attacking "political influence in this country that says it is okay to push for allegiance to a foreign country. The statements aroused anger among AIPAC supporters, but also vocal support among the progressive wing of the Democratic Party and "revived a fraught debate" in American politics over whether AIPAC has too much influence over American policy in the Middle East, while highlighting the deterioration of some relationships between progressive Democrats and pro-Israel organizations.
On March 6, 2019, the Democratic leadership put forth a resolution on the House floor condemning anti-Semitism, which was broadened to condemn bigotry against a wide variety of groups before it passed on March 7....
Good morning.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
People better wake up and think about America before they defer their thoughts to Israel.
walkingman
Oct 4
#3
Um, it's Certain Radical Christian Groups, Not All Religious people. Certainly not the Jews of Israel
electric_blue68
Oct 4
#43
No Problemo! 👍 I've heard about these Middle East Apocalyptic wanting RW Christians for a few decades...
electric_blue68
Oct 4
#46
I sure know about the Ultra Orthodox Jews of Israel, and propping up Bibi; but I didn't think they were into the..
electric_blue68
Oct 5
#56
I've been saying this for some time. I just hope people are smart enough to see through it.
Autumn
Oct 4
#12
Both tRump & Netanyahu are criminals under indictment with self-preservation motivations. tRump wants to self-pardon. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Oct 4
#15
I agree. But also, Netanyahu is in general, a dickwad, and doesn't want to give up power (he was on the edge of
SWBTATTReg
Oct 4
#19
I don't know enough about Israeli politics, but you Have Seen the Gigantic Israeli Demos vids against Bibi posted here
electric_blue68
Oct 4
#45
Netanyahu bull$hitted to SECSTATE Blinken and D/CIA Burns. Smells like 1980 GOP tactics to weaken Carter.
C0RI0LANUS
Oct 5
#55