Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

moniss

(6,166 posts)
43. It is a naivete most people have that
Sun Oct 6, 2024, 06:13 PM
Oct 6

"scheduled airlines" are the only flights using an airport especially in these circumstances and with cargo carriers. Much of that service is charter. Do I need to explain the difference between charter and scheduled? Do you think someone running a charter service is going to just ignore the risk of further strikes to their planes and personnel? Much has happened since January 2024 such as Ras Isa was functioning recently. I expect since you feel that an airport being bombed repeatedly is not an issue about safety that you will be on the next chartered flight. Have a happy trip. As I have stated before it is understood that someone who strikes receives a strike in return but it is not acceptable to just ignore the civilian population and their situation while doing so. Except for some people around the world who apparently think otherwise. If you believe that every air operation regardless of US or Israeli goes as planned and only the "bad guys" are hit then you must own the Brooklyn Bridge by now. Hodeidah was the main port for receiving food aid for that area. Do you think the ports that are in the government control are going to be able to ship aid to the Houthi controlled areas? If so you understand nothing of conflict in general or this one in particular. It is obvious you also do not understand port/shipping/distribution operations.

The fact of the matter seems that no amount of destruction and death or the acts that bring it about are unacceptable to many around the world. But we have treaties about the conduct of conflict and civilian infrastructure and civilian populations drawn up and agreed to by people who understand that the blinding urge for retaliation doesn't excuse any and all behavior or means and scope of that retaliation. They realized what people become when they lower themselves to certain levels of acceptance of unnecessary actions that impact civilian populations and dismissal of things that impact their suffering. Of course we still have huge numbers of people around the world who think "anything goes".

By the way you have no idea how the warehouses at Hodeidah are configured or differentiated for use and who has control. It is pretty clear that you feel none of these actions have the slightest impact on the reception and distribution of aid. Apparently when the UNRWA personnel in Gaza can't move because of lack of assurance of not being bombed or shot by the IDF it isn't a matter affecting distribution in your eyes and previous incidents are just "all forgotten". Or perhaps aid workers and NGO's working in conflict zones know quite well about the impact and interruption to distribution that occurs since they've lost hundreds of their personnel over the years to "accidents" or "misunderstandings". Oh wait a minute. How silly of me to think that attacks on and near aid reception/distribution areas might have an impact on operations. Nope can't possibly be because I've been assured that everything is just fine.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

damnit damnit irisblue Oct 4 #1
Netanyahu's provocations to get the U.S. as deep into this as possible... StClone Oct 4 #2
You misspelled "Houthis" AZSkiffyGeek Oct 4 #3
And here we have an example . . . Richard D Oct 4 #5
I don't think so, at least those like me who have half a brain and JohnSJ Oct 4 #8
Nobody disputes firing on those moniss Oct 4 #11
Please explain. littlemissmartypants Oct 4 #12
because Biden is bombing the Houthis? not bombing them enough? someone in the party disagrees with you on how much prodigitalson Oct 5 #39
Do you have secret inside information about Harris's views towards Israel? former9thward Oct 4 #6
no difference. JohnSJ Oct 4 #15
What will this different approach be? sarisataka Oct 4 #7
Pretty sneaky of Netanyahu to force the Houthi's to attack Israel & other ships... EX500rider Oct 4 #16
It's not just Houthi attacks on Israel prompting this. maxsolomon Oct 4 #4
I recommend. Direct attacks against the US Navy should get a response. bronxiteforever Oct 4 #9
The starvation in Yemen is moniss Oct 4 #10
I don't know that the port was rendered inoperable but littlemissmartypants Oct 4 #13
The starvation and pictures from Yemen moniss Oct 4 #14
Houthis shouldn't spend all their money on Iranian missiles, I guess NickB79 Oct 5 #17
This has been an internal conflict in Yemen for years now and is not simply a matter of moniss Oct 5 #20
The internal conflict is that the Houthis want an Islamic caliphate NickB79 Oct 5 #21
Nothing I have said is a moniss Oct 6 #41
What makes you think the port is now closed to cargo ships? EX500rider Oct 5 #18
It is not a matter of the port being totally closed moniss Oct 5 #19
And what makes you think the US didn'tjust strike Rebel boats & muntions? EX500rider Oct 5 #22
Because the reports have been that we hit more than boats moniss Oct 5 #24
Still does not mean any of the civilian infrastructure at the port or airport was hit by the US EX500rider Oct 5 #31
Because US and Israel bad and terrorists good AZSkiffyGeek Oct 5 #29
As far as I know, the port is still open and operating, MarineCombatEngineer Oct 5 #23
You express a lack of understanding about the conflict in Yemen. moniss Oct 5 #25
I think you assume too much of what I do and don't understand. nt MarineCombatEngineer Oct 5 #26
I take your expressions at face value. nt moniss Oct 5 #27
As I said.....................nt MarineCombatEngineer Oct 5 #28
I've still seen zero proof that any civilian infrastructure was hit EX500rider Oct 5 #32
The Times of Israel from 9/29/24 for example moniss Oct 5 #35
This is a thread about the US strikes not the IDF strikes EX500rider Oct 5 #36
Here's more from CBS dated 10/04 and also referencing US/UK moniss Oct 5 #37
Yes, CBS says "infrastructure, like storage facilities" What's wrong with hitting weapons & launcher storage? EX500rider Oct 5 #38
It is foolish to think that the strikes at the airport moniss Oct 6 #40
"the reluctance of any airline to fly into a questionable airport scenario" EX500rider Oct 6 #42
It is a naivete most people have that moniss Oct 6 #43
Well gosh I guess the rebels just get a free pass then right I mean long as they hide near an airport or port EX500rider Oct 6 #44
If not "the," then at least "a." Igel Oct 5 #33
Yes it is variously described in media reports as "a" main port for moniss Oct 5 #34
Are we suddenly to believe that US fighters no longer have pin point precision munitions Historic NY Oct 5 #30
Russia-backed Houthis ck4829 Oct 24 #45
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US launches airstrikes by...»Reply #43