Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,790 posts)

6. I just don't get it. It looks like a 5 to 2 Democratic advantage in the Supreme Court and...

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Sun Oct 6, 2024, 09:50 PM

Oct 6

… they still are allowing votes to be tossed on an irrelevant technicality.

A ruling on this wouldn’t change where, how, and when people cast their ballots so why is a ruling on this issue disruptive to the process?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pennsylvania high court declines to decide mail-in ballot issues before election [View all] BumRushDaShow Oct 6 OP

Is this good or bad for PA voters? ananda Oct 6 #1

Well some Counties have stepped out their outreach and reminders BumRushDaShow Oct 6 #2

OK, do you feel pretty good about mail-in outcomes then? ananda Oct 6 #3

We have had the option since the 2020 primary and all elections since BumRushDaShow Oct 6 #5

Dems need to be absolutely sure they have filled it correctly kansasobama Oct 6 #4

I just don't get it. It looks like a 5 to 2 Democratic advantage in the Supreme Court and... Hassin Bin Sober Oct 6 #6

There was a parallel federal case going on BumRushDaShow Oct 7 #7