Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(20,823 posts)
7. We don't have time to waste waiting for magic pixie dust!
Thu Oct 24, 2024, 12:29 PM
Oct 24

At this point, climate scientists agree that we need Carbon Capture, but that is in addition to drastic cuts in emissions (not instead of them.)

The "average american” (per capita) is currently responsible for 14 tons of CO₂/year.

https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-annual-greenhouse-gas-index

Climate Change: Annual greenhouse gas index
BY REBECCA LINDSEY REVIEWED BY STEPHEN MONTZKA AND JAMES BUTLER
PUBLISHED JUNE 17, 2022

Among the most basic questions about global warming is how much are human-produced greenhouse gases influencing the climate today compared to the past? To answer this question, NOAA developed the Annual Greenhouse Gas Index ("AGGI" for short). Updated yearly, the AGGI calculates the combined warming influence of the most important long-lived greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous dioxide, and a number of industrial chemicals used in cooling and refrigeration, aerosol sprays, and other processes. The total direct heating influence in a given year is compared to conditions in 1990—the year that countries who signed the U.N. Kyoto Protocol agreed to use as a benchmark for their efforts to reduce emissions.



By the end of 2022, NOAA reported that the AGGI was 1.49, meaning the direct warming influence of human-produced greenhouse gases had risen 49 percent since 1990. Most of the warming influence (64 percent) is due to carbon dioxide. Methane is the second-largest contributor (19 percent). The third-largest contributor is the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) category (8.1 percent). (CFCs were widely used in cooling systems and aerosol sprays in the mid-1900s, before we realized they damaged the ozone layer. These substances and their replacements are now regulated under the Montreal Protocol, but they are extremely long-lived in the atmosphere, so they continue to play a role in Earth's heating imbalance.)




This graph shows the heating influence caused by the major human-produced greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide (gray), methane (dark purple), nitrous oxide (medium purple), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs, lavender), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs, blue), and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs, light blue). Relative to conditions in 1750, today's atmosphere absorbs more than 3 extra watts of energy per square meter of Earth's surface. Graph by NOAA Climate.gov based on data from NOAA Global Monitoring Lab. For the complete list of chemicals in the CFC, HFC, and HCFC groups, see Figure 3 in the Full AGGI Report.Graph by NOAA Climate.gov based on data from NOAA ESRL.


To put things into perspective, in 1988, James Hansen warned Congress that Global Warming was now a scientific certainty. Since that time, the rate of global heating has increased by half. It will not decrease even if we end all emissions tomorrow. That heating is due to the gases already in the atmosphere.
Embrace the horror. Moostache Oct 24 #1
Maybe the genius Elon Musk and others like him should focus on this Redleg Oct 24 #2
I've been contemplating that re: Musk, especially lately- callous taoboy Oct 24 #5
I wonder how many of the most wealthy people truly are "good guys" Redleg Oct 24 #11
The philanthropy of the rich has tended to be less than the philanthropy of the poor (as a percentage of income) OKIsItJustMe Oct 24 #13
Good points. I guess after death is better than never. Redleg Oct 24 #15
A lot of philanthropy is a sham DSandra Oct 25 #27
Elon Musk doesn't think climate change is a threat OKIsItJustMe Oct 24 #6
But for some reason we just have to get to Mars. Redleg Oct 24 #8
Giving the devil his due OKIsItJustMe Oct 24 #12
I think you are right that Musk wants to rule without constraints Redleg Oct 24 #14
Here is a quantum leap in CO2 capture just announced yesterday masmdu Oct 24 #3
Magic pixie dust OKIsItJustMe Oct 24 #4
We don't have time to waste waiting for magic pixie dust! OKIsItJustMe Oct 24 #7
In a world of right wing politics: good fucking luck... nt EarthFirst Oct 24 #9
Someone at the UN has a dark sense of humor OKIsItJustMe Oct 24 #10
Maybe a video game will sell it OKIsItJustMe Oct 24 #16
Reuters: Climate change: UN report says planet to warm by 3.1 C without greater action OKIsItJustMe Oct 24 #17
"U.N. says only a 'quantum leap' can keep global climate goals within reach" LudwigPastorius Oct 24 #18
I wish people wouldn't make such a big deal about flooded cities OKIsItJustMe Oct 25 #24
China is producing 35-40% of the worlds CO2. Mosby Oct 25 #19
How China Became the World's Leader on Renewable Energy OKIsItJustMe Oct 25 #20
CNN: The US led on nuclear fusion for decades. Now China is in position to win the race OKIsItJustMe Oct 25 #21
Reuters: China starts up world's first fourth-generation nuclear reactor OKIsItJustMe Oct 25 #22
China is rapidly taking global renewable capacity expansion to another level OKIsItJustMe Oct 25 #23
Reuters: US power system becomes more fossil-dependent than China's OKIsItJustMe Oct 25 #25
"...it's time to stop pretending the US and EU are going to somehow magically fix climate change." OKIsItJustMe Oct 25 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.N. says only a 'quantum...»Reply #7