Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

mahatmakanejeeves

(61,989 posts)
Wed Nov 27, 2024, 01:56 PM Nov 27

Team Trump Debates 'How Much Should We Invade Mexico?' [View all]

Source: Rolling Stone

'That Is The Question'
Team Trump Debates 'How Much Should We Invade Mexico?'
In Trump's government-in-waiting, the only question is how massive the U.S. assault on Mexican drug cartels should be

By Asawin Suebsaeng, Andrew Perez
November 27, 2024

Within Donald Trump's government-in-waiting, there is a fresh debate over whether and how thoroughly the president-elect should follow through on his campaign promise to attack or even invade Mexico, as part of the "war" he's pledged to wage against powerful drug cartels. ... "How much should we invade Mexico?" says a senior Trump transition member. "That is the question." ... It is a question that would have seemed batty for the GOP elite to consider before, even during Trump's first term. But in the four years since, many within the mainstream Republican centers of power have come around to support Trump's idea to bomb or attack Mexico.

Trump's Cabinet picks, including his choices for secretary of defense and secretary of state, have publicly supported the idea of potentially unleashing the U.S. military in Mexico. So has the man Trump has tapped to be his national security adviser. So has the man Trump selected as his "border czar" to lead his immigration crackdowns. So have various Trump allies in Congress and in the media.

Trump, who has routinely (and falsely) promoted himself as the candidate who would stop "endless wars," now wants to lead a new conflict just south of our nation's border. But at this moment, it is, in the words of one Trump adviser, "unclear how far he'll go on this one." This source adds: "If things don't change, the president still believes it's necessary to take some kind of military action against these killers."

Another source close to Trump describes to Rolling Stone what they call a “soft invasion” of Mexico, in which American special forces — not a large theater deployment — would be sent covertly to assassinate cartel leaders. Indeed, this is a preliminary plan that Trump himself warmed to in private conversations this year.

{snip}

Read more: https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-mexico-drug-cartels-military-invade-1235183177/



Hat tip, commenter ASFT at Joe.My.God.

AL Haters Seek To Ban Pride Group From Xmas Parade
November 27, 2024

https://www.joemygod.com/2024/11/al-haters-seek-to-ban-pride-group-from-xmas-parade/

https://www.joemygod.com/2024/11/al-haters-seek-to-ban-pride-group-from-xmas-parade/#comment-6600837078
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And so it begins. And none of this is necessary. Scrivener7 Nov 27 #1
It benefits Trump in some way. Irish_Dem Nov 27 #11
Good grief! boonecreek Nov 27 #12
Definitely, but it won't happen. It's all a troll. Scrivener7 Nov 27 #15
Dictators need an enemy and a war against that enemy wnylib Nov 27 #17
we will never know rampartd Nov 27 #18
Cue more MAGA regret. "No wars" was one of his biggest promises & brags about his first term. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 27 #2
A few of those Drug Lords/Cartel heads might love the excuse to escalate and that might just include hlthe2b Nov 27 #3
Trump wants some of the cartel profit? Irish_Dem Nov 27 #13
So Mexico should cut a defense deal with China then? bronxiteforever Nov 27 #4
They're already leaning towards China. Scrivener7 Nov 27 #7
Agree and just like you said earlier bronxiteforever Nov 27 #8
It's a win for China. Irish_Dem Nov 27 #14
The author of this piece doesn't seem to remember, Trump DID Mike 03 Nov 27 #5
War is a two way street. Dan Nov 27 #6
He wants Mexico to pay him not to invade? Irish_Dem Nov 27 #9
Serioulsy doubt any of these Trumpers actually know how to kill people, Deminpenn Nov 27 #10
Here's a thought: Stop selling guns to the cartel, you fucking idiots. Baitball Blogger Nov 27 #16
Well, Mexico is crazy if they think they can weaponize migrants like Texas did to NY mathematic Nov 27 #19
"penetration, howsomever slight ...." rampartd Nov 27 #20
It's called INVASION e.g. a declaration of war with fewer steps. NotHardly Nov 27 #21
So, we supply the cartels with guns ... ananda Nov 27 #22
Maybe the CIA is in on this game. That is their usual MO, just ask Saddam Hussein LT Barclay Nov 27 #30
Is this the Onion? Sky high tariffs and now an invasion? LeftInTX Nov 27 #23
Without war or talking about war, the Republicans have nothing. C0RI0LANUS Nov 27 #24
"only presidential administration in the history of the US that did not fire a single shot" EX500rider Nov 27 #25
True, the Carter Admin. attempted a rescue mission out of frustration. C0RI0LANUS Nov 27 #29
My dad who was a computer programmer and not given to political statements LT Barclay Nov 27 #31
Your father was right, LT Barclay. GOP strategy: Make the Democrats look weak on national security. C0RI0LANUS Nov 28 #32
An article in either The Atlantic or The Nation also said that Nixon's negotiations with Vietnam promised war LT Barclay Nov 28 #33
Thank you for this article. Nixon screwed a lot of people; John McCain and LBJ never spoke up about it. C0RI0LANUS Nov 28 #34
I had a friend that spent seven years in Vietnam doing that - searching for MIA/POW and bringing back remains. N/t SomewhereInTheMiddle Nov 29 #41
That must have been both rewarding and grueling for him. C0RI0LANUS Nov 29 #42
I doubt sand storms and defective helicopters & runways collisions were part of any plan. EX500rider Nov 28 #37
"The Eagle Claw commando team may have been issued with non-lethal rounds" EX500rider Nov 28 #36
True. And the failed Eagle Claw mission led to future innovations in USSOF. C0RI0LANUS Nov 28 #38
I believe the sky Marshals were issued frangible rounds which are lethal but don't over penetrate EX500rider Nov 28 #39
You're probably right about the frangible rounds, EX500rider. C0RI0LANUS Nov 28 #40
Is this a hostile takeover of the cartels? bucolic_frolic Nov 27 #26
Trump fears the cartels and would appease them. delisen Nov 27 #27
"WE'RE GONNA INVADE MEXICO, AND BELIZE IS GONNA PAY FOR IT!!" Montauk6 Nov 27 #28
The cartels would respond with terrorism across the US NickB79 Nov 28 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Team Trump Debates 'How M...