Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(36,715 posts)
4. Okay, now the real question: Why was that the decision?
Thu Nov 28, 2024, 10:54 AM
Nov 2024

Otherwise it comes across as what too many Americans think is what judges do: Just look at something and make up the law as they see fit based on pretty much nothing but politics and personal opinion.

The last two play a role, but that "rule by law" bit isn't so much widely believed in actual fact but cited as a kind of appeal to authority by somebody who likes a unpopular decision. I mean, even places like NPR act like "rule by man" is what's really happening by giving no "role to law" in their discussion or most of their analysis--and for the majority of folk who are headline skimmers, it's not "just the facts, ma'am," but "give me the outrage-inducing conclusion".

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court backs Texas over ra...»Reply #4