Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

forgotmylogin

(7,688 posts)
4. This was a DEFINITE gaffe by the promotion/copy writing department.
Tue Dec 3, 2024, 02:20 PM
Dec 3

Likely Mattel not the movie. First rule of including a URL in ad copy: visit that URL and see what it leads to, especially if your IP is a common word.

"Wicked Pictures" has been an adult video/toy company long before this movie was ever green-lit (1993) and are a legit brand - they likely did not snap up this website name intentionally nor maliciously hoping to steal clicks from the movie property. They do have an age gate, and (yes, I did check) clicking through currently shows sexy but clothed models. Using Wayback shows back in January there was nudity on the front page of the site, but I'd bet they likely cleaned it up a bit once this started happening.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mattel Sued Over 'Wicked'...»Reply #4