Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(106,776 posts)
4. A question about this new "policy." Would they allow her to play in the men's field?
Thu Dec 5, 2024, 06:41 AM
Dec 5

I'm curious about how they think they can refuse participation at all...

And golf, especially--a sport for which I quite freely admit to holding no particular knowledge of how there would or would not be an argument for "benefit" imparted from having gone through puberty. Just trying to understand their "thinking" in making this stance. Does the possible ability to hit the ball harder really create such a differential and advantage? It seems you have to be able to direct it too.

My attempt to follow their rationale leaves me again asking: how do they think they can refuse participation at all? It doesn't seem like this policy is defensible--even if one ignores any malign motivations for making it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»LPGA and USGA to require ...»Reply #4