Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BumRushDaShow

(144,256 posts)
Sat Dec 7, 2024, 06:41 AM Dec 7

Vance, GOP committees ask Supreme Court to strike down coordination limits [View all]

Source: The Hill

12/06/24 7:02 PM ET


Vice President-elect JD Vance and Republican committees asked the Supreme Court to overturn federal limits that restrict political parties from coordinating spending with candidates on the grounds that they violate the First Amendment.

Limits on contributions to candidates are much lower than they are to party committees such as the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) and the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), which are also plaintiffs along with former Rep. Steve Chabot (R-Ohio).

“A political party exists to get its candidates elected. Yet Congress has severely restricted how much parties can spend on their own campaign advertising if done in cooperation with those very candidates,” the plaintiffs wrote in the petition made public Friday. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) declined to comment on litigation.

While a candidate can only accept $3,300 per person per election during the 2024 cycle, the NRSC could take in as much as $578,200 from a single donor per cycle. Limits on how much spending party committees can coordinate with candidates were originally set in part to guard against corruption and outsized influence from a small group of wealthy individuals.

Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5027561-vance-gop-committees-ask-supreme-court-to-strike-down-coordination-limits/

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
These guys are just so sure they have their own personal Supreme Court in their pocket, they will try anything Walleye Dec 7 #1
What worries me is that they will win more than they will lose in that kangaroo court. (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Dec 7 #2
We should be worried, but there doesn't seem to be a damn thing we can do about it Walleye Dec 7 #3
Oh, there is something we can do about it. OldBaldy1701E Dec 7 #5
Unfortunately, I don't think it's that simple, Minuteman are not going to solve our problem now Walleye Dec 7 #7
what-- start a new revolution? How do you propose to fight exactly? LymphocyteLover Dec 7 #8
Ironically, this is essentially the argument of many on the right, when it comes to gun control! n/t thesquanderer Dec 7 #12
Agreed action has to take place oldmanlynn Dec 7 #15
That might work. OldBaldy1701E Dec 7 #26
Which John Parker? sabbat hunter Dec 7 #23
My apologies, I did not notice that. OldBaldy1701E Dec 7 #25
In their pocket? It's actually worse. 3825-87867 Dec 7 #11
Citizens United must be overturned, no matter what. We have no Republic and no Democracy. These GOPers Jit423 Dec 7 #4
Democrats had a bill to address/get rid of Citizen's United BumRushDaShow Dec 7 #6
Yes, this is the chance for the SC to either overturn or double-down on Citizen's United. thesquanderer Dec 7 #13
One of the most important things Dems can do is push campaign finance reform LymphocyteLover Dec 7 #9
They have BumRushDaShow Dec 7 #10
Yes, I know they've tried. They need to keep talking about it and pushing it LymphocyteLover Dec 7 #18
I am certain they will BumRushDaShow Dec 7 #20
Yes, I'm sure some Dems will. I just wish they'd learn to speak with a more unified voice LymphocyteLover Dec 8 #27
Wow karin_sj Dec 7 #14
USA oligarchs are coming for us all & they've spring loaded the S Ct. NotHardly Dec 7 #16
The GOP is just done with democracy at this point. Initech Dec 7 #17
We should get back to "Speech" meaning words or images, period. The Mouth Dec 7 #19
Was $260 million that had to be 'diverted' to a PAC not enough? EarthFirst Dec 7 #21
Like Citizens United wasn't enough..............about the First Amendment............ turbinetree Dec 7 #22
What the fucking hell? Citizens United wasn't enough for you goddamn people? Karasu Dec 7 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Vance, GOP committees ask...