Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

angrychair

(9,895 posts)

9. Doesn't have a choice

Reply to montanacowboy (Reply #7)

Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:57 PM

Dec 9

It's required by law that has already made the rounds in court.
Silver lining is that drilling would be a decade away if ever. The lower prices go the less likely they are to drill there as it's not cost effective.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lulu KC C Moon

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US to offer oil and gas leases in Alaska wildlife refuge on Jan. 9 [View all] OKIsItJustMe Dec 9 OP

i give cilla4progress Dec 9 #1

What??????? Lulu KC Dec 9 #2

THey might purchase them Red Mountain Dec 9 #3

The GOP could care less about the environment or anything that is not profit producing. walkingman Dec 9 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Dec 9 #5

Why??? alarimer Dec 9 #6

Why is Biden doing this? montanacowboy Dec 9 #7

Doesn't have a choice angrychair Dec 9 #9

article says it was part of 2017 tax bill travelingthrulife Dec 10 #12

I'm wondering if they're trying to preempt Trump plans and perhaps partly limit the damage he'll do. LauraInLA Dec 9 #8

I wouldn't worry about it just yet because as others have said they aren't likely to drill now. cstanleytech Dec 9 #10

Other than corporate greed, why? We don't need the oil or gas from there. CousinIT Dec 10 #11