Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Mon Jul 3, 2017, 06:22 AM Jul 2017

Dem super delegate, in room full of health insurance execs, laughs off prospect of single payer [View all]

Democratic super delegate, in room full of health insurance execs, laughs off prospect of single payer.
Lee Fang; July 1 2017

<snip>

Gephardt, who serves as a Democratic “superdelegate” responsible for choosing the party’s presidential nominee, was asked about the possibility of single payer at the Centene Corporation annual investor day conference at The Pierre, a ritzy five-star hotel in New York City.

<snip>

“There is no way you could pass single payer in any intermediate future,” Gephardt declared. America, he added, has the “greatest health care system in the world, bar none.” And while single payer would provide universal coverage, there would be less quality and innovation without the “involvement of the private sector.”

The claim that single payer suppresses innovation is an old argument that does not stand up to scrutiny. Most medical innovation in the U.S. are already government funded, through universities receiving federal subsidies and grants, as well as through the National Institutes of Health. A single-payer insurance system, like Medicare, would simply negotiate for lower prices from providers, and would likely steer savings towards greater investments in research and development. Claims about lower quality care are also highly disputed, given that countries with single payer and tightly regulated universal health systems perform much higher than the U.S. in a range of health outcomes.

<snip>

In the past, the health insurance industry has deployed sophisticated propaganda efforts to divide single-payer proponents and weaken any political support for the idea. Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton once considered such a system, but wondered, “Is there any force on the face of the earth that would counter the money the insurance industry would spend to defeat it?”

Gephardt, notably, became a corporate lobbyist after serving as a populist Democratic lawmaker from Missouri. His clients have included Peabody Coal and Goldman Sachs, among others. He also serves on the board of Centene, receiving annual compensation of around $315,965 in cash and stock awards.

https://theintercept.com/2017/07/01/dick-gephardt-single-payer-health-insurance-lobbyists/

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does "quality" mean my healthcare is better just because someone poorer than me can't get it? ck4829 Jul 2017 #1
Yes, rise up by stepping on the heads of others IronLionZion Jul 2017 #3
Oh, I know the answer they have in their heads but will not say ck4829 Jul 2017 #6
She you hear the term "establishment" used derisively, HopeAgain Jul 2017 #2
Why is he a superdelegate? Sienna86 Jul 2017 #4
From an article in the Guardian from April 2016 . . . markpkessinger Jul 2017 #24
No problem here. Nothing wrong. No need for Voltaire2 Jul 2017 #5
We need to take advantage of our political awakening under the Trump era and not mess Dustlawyer Jul 2017 #7
Well said and exactly to the point! rainy Jul 2017 #30
Yet I am told here daily -- Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2017 #8
Can you explain what the "corporatization of the Democratic Party" because I do not know pirateshipdude Jul 2017 #10
This is a rhetorical expression from the far left, murielm99 Jul 2017 #11
The main reason I rarely post. Scruffy1 Jul 2017 #19
Thank you for correcting that bit of historical misinformation! markpkessinger Jul 2017 #25
Me neither! rainy Jul 2017 #31
The Intercept? Seriously? murielm99 Jul 2017 #9
Posts like the OP should be automatically deleted when using the INtercept IMO joeybee12 Jul 2017 #27
And that is why I am opposed to "superdelegates." Vinca Jul 2017 #12
If we don't have super delegates, murielm99 Jul 2017 #13
The whole idea of superdelegates is undemocratic. In the last election, for example, there were Vinca Jul 2017 #16
If you want to refight the primary, murielm99 Jul 2017 #18
I don't care about the last primary. I'm concerned about the next primary. Vinca Jul 2017 #28
The voters chose our candidate NYResister Jul 2017 #23
Agree in general but think caucuses should be eliminated as undemocratic delisen Jul 2017 #32
Isn't the Intercept the work of Glenn Greenwald who has hated Democrats for years? George II Jul 2017 #14
Yes. That's his. murielm99 Jul 2017 #17
Apparently no true Democrat can disagree. Igel Jul 2017 #15
Not gonna give billionaire looneytarian Omidyar the click. OilemFirchen Jul 2017 #20
You obviously agree with Gephardt kacekwl Jul 2017 #29
I'm not laughing it off. OilemFirchen Jul 2017 #33
this is how Democrats could continue to lose yurbud Jul 2017 #21
Gephardt like his lobbyist $$$ me thinks benld74 Jul 2017 #22
Unrecced for source nt joeybee12 Jul 2017 #26
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Dem super delegate, in ro...