Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

still_one

(96,813 posts)

4. It should be obvious to anyone with minimal critical thinking skills that there is a better

Reply to Hoyt (Reply #3)

Fri Jul 28, 2017, 11:31 AM

Jul 2017

better opportunity to get progressive change done under Democratic control than republican

I know there are a good number who are upset that the ACA didn't include a public option or Medicare for all, but the fact is they didn't have the votes at the time, and they barely got the ACA passed

They have been trying to push universal health care through since Truman. In 1993 we all saw what happened with Hillary's healthcare plan.

That the ACA even happened is an amazing achievement, and it is the foot in the door, which the republicans are trying to close

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Medicare for All vs. All the Healthcare That Each Can Afford [View all] kristopher Jul 2017 OP

Rep. John Conyers has introduced his Medicare For All bill every year since 2003. lapucelle Jul 2017 #1

well if people were really concerned about that they should have voted for Hillary over trump in still_one Jul 2017 #2

Good point. I can see a public option in the next decade, but not Medicare for all with no Hoyt Jul 2017 #3

It should be obvious to anyone with minimal critical thinking skills that there is a better still_one Jul 2017 #4

Conyers's bill has strong support in the House. lapucelle Jul 2017 #5

It would be helpful if we can regain the house and senate in 2018 still_one Jul 2017 #6

Absolutely Crucial & Essential Me. Jul 2017 #9

Succinct & To The Point Me. Jul 2017 #7

What a strange, off-point, aggressive response. kristopher Jul 2017 #8

Democrat John Conyers has been pushing for Medicare for All for 15 years. lapucelle Jul 2017 #10

Instead of stupid political infighting why not concentrate on selling policy? kristopher Jul 2017 #11

If the goal is to "educate the uninformed public", lapucelle Jul 2017 #12

Thank you. sheshe2 Jul 2017 #14

Lapucelle isn't the poster doing the "stupid political infighting." brer cat Jul 2017 #13

The OP is The Sanders Institute. sheshe2 Jul 2017 #17

How is it Infighting? JHan Jul 2017 #18

Why is that with Nina Turner, Cornel West, Jeffrey Sachs, and Tulsi Gabbard on that team they are still_one Jul 2017 #21

Yup. sheshe2 Jul 2017 #20

This is not a new concept. sheshe2 Jul 2017 #15

Because only :cough: a certain person deserves credit NastyRiffraff Jul 2017 #22

All our single-payer systems are DEMOCRATIC PARTY products. Hortensis Jul 2017 #24

Medicare is paid for by a payroll tax, Progressive dog Jul 2017 #16

Thanks for the link ++++++++++ JHan Jul 2017 #19

Have you seen this article area51 Jul 2017 #23