Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brer cat

(26,503 posts)
13. Lapucelle isn't the poster doing the "stupid political infighting."
Fri Jul 28, 2017, 06:48 PM
Jul 2017

How many on DU do you include in that "uninformed" group that you are ostensibly trying to educate? I daresay there are none here who need to read that long-winded incredibly boring article to know the benefits of single payer over private insurance. It is insulting to suggest that we do.

This idea is nothing new, which is the point that Lapucelle was making with reference to Conyers' bill (and yes, it is Conyers not Conner). Is there a particular reason that you think we need to start over from ground zero when work has been done on this for years and years?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rep. John Conyers has introduced his Medicare For All bill every year since 2003. lapucelle Jul 2017 #1
well if people were really concerned about that they should have voted for Hillary over trump in still_one Jul 2017 #2
Good point. I can see a public option in the next decade, but not Medicare for all with no Hoyt Jul 2017 #3
It should be obvious to anyone with minimal critical thinking skills that there is a better still_one Jul 2017 #4
Conyers's bill has strong support in the House. lapucelle Jul 2017 #5
It would be helpful if we can regain the house and senate in 2018 still_one Jul 2017 #6
Absolutely Crucial & Essential Me. Jul 2017 #9
Succinct & To The Point Me. Jul 2017 #7
What a strange, off-point, aggressive response. kristopher Jul 2017 #8
Democrat John Conyers has been pushing for Medicare for All for 15 years. lapucelle Jul 2017 #10
Instead of stupid political infighting why not concentrate on selling policy? kristopher Jul 2017 #11
If the goal is to "educate the uninformed public", lapucelle Jul 2017 #12
Thank you. sheshe2 Jul 2017 #14
Lapucelle isn't the poster doing the "stupid political infighting." brer cat Jul 2017 #13
The OP is The Sanders Institute. sheshe2 Jul 2017 #17
How is it Infighting? JHan Jul 2017 #18
Why is that with Nina Turner, Cornel West, Jeffrey Sachs, and Tulsi Gabbard on that team they are still_one Jul 2017 #21
Yup. sheshe2 Jul 2017 #20
This is not a new concept. sheshe2 Jul 2017 #15
Because only :cough: a certain person deserves credit NastyRiffraff Jul 2017 #22
All our single-payer systems are DEMOCRATIC PARTY products. Hortensis Jul 2017 #24
Medicare is paid for by a payroll tax, Progressive dog Jul 2017 #16
Thanks for the link ++++++++++ JHan Jul 2017 #19
Have you seen this article area51 Jul 2017 #23
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Medicare for All vs. All ...»Reply #13