Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

gab13by13

(26,787 posts)

2. To answer your question

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Wed Jul 3, 2024, 08:44 AM

Jul 2024

Some evidence may not be allowed, like Hope Hick's testimony in the Oval office, that evidence may now not be allowed, but it may not be needed. We still have the David Pecker evidence from the Oval office and that testimony certainly is not official business.

I believe there will be enough evidence that is allowable to sustain the conviction.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

shrike3

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge Merchan faces the task of applying the Supreme Court's immunity ruling.--2 key questions......... [View all] riversedge Jul 2024 OP

They are NY state convictions. State convictions, not federal. brush Jul 2024 #1

And yet states are subordinate to the Constitution. Igel Jul 2024 #3

There's nothing unconstitutional about the state on NY finding trump guilty. brush Jul 2024 #4

To answer your question gab13by13 Jul 2024 #2