Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(73,508 posts)
1. This plan sucks.
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 05:48 AM
Jan 2017






........................................Republicans will say that their leave bill provides full pay while Tucker caps his at $500 per week. I'm sure if the cap is the problem, Tucker would be happy to take it off. The money for all these salaries is already budgeted, no additional expenditure is incurred by the leave his bill provides. Under Tucker's bill as written, the state actually saves money on anyone making more than $26,000 a year.

The Irvin bill insures the state won't spend a cent. Money is tight. But I suspect this is more political than fiscal.

I wish I'd known about the Hutchinson administration's submarining of Tucker on this bill before I wrote a glowing column about the governor this week. At a minimu, I'd have added an asterisk.

If paid maternity leave is good employment policy — it is and it ought to cover men, too (a deficiency of both bills) — the employer should pay for it, not ask a bunch of working stiffs to fork over their accrued days off to do it.


Pregnancy isn't a catastrophe in my book. Republican governance? That is another matter.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Arkansas»GOP comes up with plan to...»Reply #1