Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Colorado

silverweb

(16,402 posts)

2. Saw this coming.

Reply to fizzgig (Original post)

Sat Mar 21, 2015, 06:06 PM

Mar 2015

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]The miniscule percentage of rain that people might catch and save would have NO effect on groundwater levels.

Saying it belongs to "the system" means only that the profiteers are afraid of people paying for less water - especially once corporations succeed in privatizing the supply, which is the ultimate goal.

Once again, as always, this obstruction is purely corporate profit driven.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Colorado "rain barrel bill" hits choppy water in tough House debate [View all] fizzgig Mar 2015 OP

I haven't lived in Colorado for almost nineteen years... NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #1

i've been hearing about it since i was a kid fizzgig Mar 2015 #5

Saw this coming. silverweb Mar 2015 #2

the 600 gallon limit is enough to water your lawn once, maybe twice fizzgig Mar 2015 #4

Absolutely sickening. silverweb Mar 2015 #11

yes, people, colorado really has laws that forbid one to capture rainwater. a fact that niyad Mar 2015 #3

yeah, there is still some insanity here fizzgig Mar 2015 #6

I live in fundieville, so still lots of insanity. niyad Mar 2015 #7

I was amazed to find out about this. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2015 #10

Needs some very serious thought. madamesilverspurs Mar 2015 #8

That changed in 2009 Canoe52 Mar 2015 #13

No kidding, it does all go the same place, it just saves potable water on the way Warpy Mar 2015 #9

Reason for debate - water company profits packman Mar 2015 #12

That's exactly it Warpy Mar 2015 #14