N.C. elections board denies GOP effort to toss 60,000 votes in close state Supreme Court race

[OldBaldy1701E]

1. These people.

We hold an election.

Person A wins.

Person B calls for a recount.

Recount shows that person A won by even more than originally tallied.

Person B demand another recount.

Recount two shows that first recount was wrong. Person A won by even more votes than the first two tallies.

Now, how much is anyone willing to bet that even this will not be enough to stop them from contesting over and over?

What did Einstein say about insanity? Do we need any more evidence of just how crazy these people are?

And, why are we letting them keep on with this crap How about some arrests for election interference.? How is what they are doing any different from other forms of interference? How many times should we allow them to gum up the works with all the evidence pointing to the fact that they lost, once there has been a lawful recount and that backs up the original decision?

Why are we letting them do this every time one of the rethugs gets butthurt over losing an election?

(Since these questions are pretty much rhetorical, I am not actually looking for answers, but please feel free to offer one!)