Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(16,276 posts)
2. Bear with me, I'm working slower than you.
Sun Nov 12, 2023, 10:14 AM
Nov 2023

Just using your first example, an increase in marginal rate (above $1 mil) from 5% to 9%:

$2 million income (your example) :
$50,000 + $90,000 = $140,000, or 7% of total income , a 2% increase in the overall (not marginal) tax rate.

You'd never see an increase in the total tax rate, obviously, as the higher marginal tax rate doesn't apply your entire income.

You'd never see a 4% increase in the total tax rate, obviously, as the higher marginal tax rate doesn't apply your entire income.

Does that make sense?

I agree that the taxes paid are 140% of what you would have paid without the 4% increase in the top marginal rate.

A more accurate headline for this article would have said something along the lines of "a 3% increase in the top marginal rate". Assuming, of course, that is what's being proposed. It seems pretty likely, but the article is short on details.

=======

On edit:

This just a different way of looking at the same numbers. I know that's probably stating the obvious, for many here. The increase in taxes paid would certainly be of interest to the taxpayers affected, while the change in overall tax rate seems better for comparing the tax rate paid by various income level taxpayers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Vermont»Advocates Want to Raise T...»Reply #2