Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Denzil_DC

(7,942 posts)
22. Thanks, Ghost Dog.
Thu Nov 28, 2019, 06:27 AM
Nov 2019

It gets tiresome having to debunk the same claims when the person making them apparently doesn't bother reading the replies.

The last time Sophie posted that particular claim, I posted this:

Mr Corbyn nonetheless stood behind the comments, insisting that he was referring to a specific group of “pro-Israel activists” and had not used the term Zionist as a “euphemism” for the Jewish community.

He said he had spoken at the conference to “defend the Palestinian ambassador in the face of what I thought were deliberate misrepresentations” from people “for whom English was a first language, when it isn’t for the ambassador.

“I described those pro-Israel activists as Zionists, in the accurate political sense and not as a euphemism for Jewish people – and that is made clear in the rest of my speech that day,” he said. “I am now more careful with how I might use the term ‘Zionist’ because a once self-identifying political term has been increasingly hijacked by antisemites as code for Jews.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-zionists-speech-english-irony-reports-parliamentary-standards-antisemitism-a8507196.html


More context from Larry Derfner, who initially joined in the condemnation of Corbyn's remarks:

Knowing to whom and to what Corbyn was referring in his “English irony” remark makes it impossible, in my view, to consider it anti-Semitic in any way.

He was referring to an exchange that had taken place recently at a conference on Gaza that he hosted in Parliament. One of the speakers there, Manuel Hassassian, the Palestinian ambassador to the U.K., reportedly said, “You know I’m reaching the conclusion that the Jews are the children of God, the only children of God and the Promised Land is being paid by God! I have started to believe this because nobody is stopping Israel building its messianic dream of Eretz Israel to the point I believe that maybe God is on their side.”

Clearly, he was not being serious; he was being ironic.

Just as clearly, Hassassian is not a native Englishman. He was born and raised in Jerusalem, didn’t live in London until he was over 50. He speaks with an Arabic accent.

This is the crucial thing to know in order to understand what Corbyn says later at the Palestinian Return Centre about the Zionists in question and English irony.

As seen in the video, Corbyn recalls that after Hassassian’s speech in Parliament, some Zionists in the audience “berated” Hassassian for what he said. He then makes his infamous comment, but he does so in direct comparison with Hassassian, noting that those who berated the ambassador “don’t want to study history, and secondly, having lived in this country for a very long time, probably all their lives, don’t understand English irony either.” By comparison, Corbyn went on, “Manuel does understand English irony, and uses it very effectively.”

This context reveals that Corbyn was not calling out Jews; he was not even calling out Zionists in general. He was calling out those particular Zionists who’d berated Hassassian.

He was not ridiculing them for being alien, for failing or refusing to acculturate themselves to such things as English irony, which would have indeed been a classic anti-Semitic remark. Instead, he was simply ridiculing them for being, as an Englishman might put it, relatively thick.

https://forward.com/opinion/409563/the-missing-information-that-exonerates-jeremy-corbyn/


It was indeed a very specific comment in a specific context. I also note that Miriam Margolyes had no compunction about using the term "Zionist" in the same sense in her Channel TV interview on antisemitism the other day.

At this stage in the election, I'd very much rather be talking about the subject of the OP.
WTF? CottonBear Nov 2019 #1
i've been telling the trumpkin in my life to watch what is happening in the uk. mopinko Nov 2019 #2
Spot on. NotHardly Nov 2019 #3
The cancer has spread LittleGirl Nov 2019 #4
Yup. a global conspiracy. LiberalLovinLug Nov 2019 #5
ya know the thing that baffles me most? these people are all looking for conspiracies, mopinko Nov 2019 #15
And how does the "fence post" in your life respond? paleotn Nov 2019 #7
well, honestly, this one is trying to hang on to his intellectual honesty, such as it is. mopinko Nov 2019 #14
He does sound salvageable and that's good. paleotn Nov 2019 #17
my observation- step 1- bait them into acting like assholes. mopinko Nov 2019 #18
So.... UK head Rabbi saying Jeremy unfit vs Boris flogging the NHS. mwooldri Nov 2019 #6
Sorry I have to disagree Soph0571 Nov 2019 #9
What are some of the Labour nazis' names, Soph? Mc Mike Nov 2019 #11
They are not Nazi's rather the far left but it is the same tropes Soph0571 Nov 2019 #12
Thanks for the re, Soph. With your prompting, I saw the anti-semitism issues around Mc Mike Nov 2019 #16
He never said "Jews / British." Ghost Dog Nov 2019 #20
Thanks, Ghost Dog. Denzil_DC Nov 2019 #22
Interesting info. I like the forward. Mc Mike Nov 2019 #25
Thanks for the reply, Ghost. I like Soph, and she's one of the few self identified UK post-ers Mc Mike Nov 2019 #26
You've got it, Mc Mike. Ghost Dog Nov 2019 #28
Thanks for the article, Ghost. Excellent and full of info. Mc Mike Nov 2019 #29
Yes... Corporate and in our case State-owned media (the BBC)... Ghost Dog Nov 2019 #30
State ownership of BBC seems like it could still lead to corporate influence, Mc Mike Nov 2019 #32
Yes. The Zionist thing is/should be seen as a red herring. Ghost Dog Nov 2019 #33
I looked at the tweet. The art is really shitty, as well as being nazi. Mc Mike Nov 2019 #24
"Yes, Jeremy is pro Palestine but he isn't anti-Judaism" FiveGoodMen Nov 2019 #10
This is a good read on it from the New Statesman Soph0571 Nov 2019 #13
But there is not one concrete example of what is denounced Ghost Dog Nov 2019 #19
I actually think the NHS will be easier to fix than Labour's scandals T_i_B Nov 2019 #23
Of course it is up for sale Soph0571 Nov 2019 #8
It's clear the U.S. negotiators want a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Ghost Dog Nov 2019 #21
Also the GOP wants to destroy the NHS. bronxiteforever Nov 2019 #27
Uncle Sam, the real Sam, is not so very hungry, though, Ghost Dog Nov 2019 #31
You are right Ghost Dog. The average American bronxiteforever Nov 2019 #34
Thanks for that, bronxiteforever! Ghost Dog Nov 2019 #35
Thanks Ghost Dog! Back at you. bronxiteforever Nov 2019 #36
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Jeremy Corbyn reveals dos...»Reply #22