Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Computer Help and Support
In reply to the discussion: To XP or not to XP . . . ? [View all]ucrdem
(15,702 posts)5. Good point.
I left it out of the OP but here's my story: Some older 16-bit programs (like WP 5.1) will only run on DOS, Win 95/8, or Win XP. DOS and Win 95/8 are useless for most internet applications, so for connectivity, i.e. if you want to send your data to another PC somewhere, XP is the best alternative. Also, DOS and Win 95/8 machines can't handle most USB hardware, meaning floppy disks or nothing, and they stopped selling floppy disks several years ago. If that hadn't happened I'd still be using my 1996 HP Pavilion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's a good idea if you have Virtualbox to do the last updates while you can.
Spitfire of ATJ
Mar 2014
#34
Great post. And I agree heartily with the Linux Mint recommendation below it. n/t
jtuck004
Mar 2014
#11
Of course the WSJ wants you to spend money for something you most likely won't need.
hobbit709
Mar 2014
#24
Windows XP support is ending on April 8 and scammers from India has become hyperactive!
David_ness
Mar 2014
#32