Hillary Clinton

stopbush

(24,632 posts)

19. Of course, it was Hillary who won when there was a big turnout, not Sanders.

Wed Jun 8, 2016, 09:21 AM

Jun 2016

Sanders needed a big turnout of either indies or people who don't normally vote in primaries. He got neither in CA. But turnout was still high.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Won CA By 13 Points [View all] stopbush Jun 2016 OP

This was a massive victory and just goes to show... SaschaHM Jun 2016 #1

I worked hard with my two college-student daughters for Hillary in CA! eastwestdem Jun 2016 #37

You are AWESOME!!! savalez Jun 2016 #42

What people don't know jimw81 Jun 2016 #41

I can imagine how pleasantly surprised you were.. I know I was! Cha Jun 2016 #2

It was great to vote in CA yesterday, and it was nice to not be sweating stopbush Jun 2016 #8

Thank you! But, he spent sooo much money and time trying to change your minds.. Cha Jun 2016 #13

You are a worrier. fleabiscuit Jun 2016 #29

Not 1 or 2 points!?~~Just Amazing! Woah!!!! Boojah!!! Her Sister Jun 2016 #3

Dancing in my chair right not wryter2000 Jun 2016 #4

Well, this has been a surprise, a very welcome surprise, do you know the Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #5

According to 538, Hillary's target was only 236, and she got 256. BS' target was 239, and he only.. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2016 #24

Thanks for the info. She actually got enough pledged delegates in California to give her the Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #25

I wasn't confident about CA, so I was more than pleasantly surprised to find that not only did she.. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2016 #28

Yes, guess we were somewhat anxious to see the magic numbers reached, again I will be Thinkingabout Jun 2016 #31

I was pretty certain CA would go to Hillary. Why? Because more and more Californians vote by mail, BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #33

I've been gun shy on polling ever since MI, and there were recent polls showing a 1 pt. difference. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2016 #35

I guess they forgot to put the number "3" beside the "1". :-) That said, I didn't take any polls BlueCaliDem Jun 2016 #36

Felt bad for 538 jimw81 Jun 2016 #40

I saw some of that. savalez Jun 2016 #43

I thought worst case it would be within 10 points, never thought it would be double digits still_one Jun 2016 #6

There's a chance the lead could shrink down to single digits stopbush Jun 2016 #10

I guess there is, but with 94% of the vote in, I don't think so still_one Jun 2016 #12

Good.. he went up .1 more since I read it an hour ago. Cha Jun 2016 #15

Looking at what happened yesterday, plus all primaries previous primaries, Hillary still_one Jun 2016 #18

BOOM! workinclasszero Jun 2016 #7

Didn't Sanders predict a win in CA? stopbush Jun 2016 #11

most of his comments were.... RussBLib Jun 2016 #14

Of course, it was Hillary who won when there was a big turnout, not Sanders. stopbush Jun 2016 #19

Not true, there was a big turnout in 2008 Legends303 Jun 2016 #20

Hillary's win in CA in '08 was only 8 points. She blew past that last night to double digits. If.. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2016 #26

Yes she ran a great campaign workinclasszero Jun 2016 #32

60,000 PEOPLE AT A RALLY IN OAKLAND!! stopbush Jun 2016 #22

You're kidding.. "60,000"... wow.. BS must be feelin' the bern of losing? Cha Jun 2016 #38

Bern't toast liberal N proud Jun 2016 #9

We did our part and burned it down for HILLARY! grossproffit Jun 2016 #16

Considering all the Republican effort to the contrary... robbedvoter Jun 2016 #17

Most of the polls had her up by only 2-points. She exceeded expectations in CA WI_DEM Jun 2016 #21

I'm guessing Ds decided that the Sanders experiment had runs its course stopbush Jun 2016 #23

K&R missingthebigdog Jun 2016 #27

amazing. MFM008 Jun 2016 #30

I predicted 10-15 :) BootinUp Jun 2016 #34

So you know things.. Cool. Cha Jun 2016 #39