Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

John Kerry

In reply to the discussion: Filibuster reform? [View all]

karynnj

(59,944 posts)
4. On filibuster reform, I think you may be misreading what is written
Fri Nov 30, 2012, 05:44 PM
Nov 2012

There are several Senators listed as leaning against it - then Rockefeller and Kerry are listed as leaning for the change. The fact is there is NO RULE CHANGE yet spelled out. Therefore, no Senator will say point blank that they are for the ambiguous "it". As you pointed out, Kerry and his staff have told Blue Mass in detail the types of changes that Kerry is for. That is more than is known for all but a few Senators (Merkely and Harkin who wrote legislation).

There is nothing to support Kerry doing anything against Rice - all he did was to be among the first to defend her and to praise her with far more superlatives than would be required. (Actually exceptional as he is her competitor.)

The fact that black and liberal media are supporting Rice is obvious. I just wish that they would leave it at supporting Rice (and defending her) without denigrating Kerry or anyone else. He did NOTHING to deserve that.

It is just as bad to attack Kerry because he is white and male as to have rejected Rice for being black and female.

Filibuster reform? [View all] politicasista Nov 2012 OP
People and rumors are out to kill Kerry, so please, stop that immediately. Mass Nov 2012 #1
edited op politicasista Nov 2012 #2
No emotion. Just you posting things that are not even in the article. Mass Nov 2012 #3
Oh. Ok n/t politicasista Nov 2012 #8
Why are you 'sure Kerry will vote for it' when he didn't vote in favor of it last time ? PoliticAverse Nov 2012 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author Mass Nov 2012 #11
I am not sure why he did not vote on this one Mass Nov 2012 #14
He did not vote against it - he was out of country for Obama, I think karynnj Nov 2012 #16
On filibuster reform, I think you may be misreading what is written karynnj Nov 2012 #4
in BMG or the WaPo article politicasista Nov 2012 #6
Do you yourself find Randi Rhodes credible? karynnj Nov 2012 #17
Haven't said anything about this in the group politicasista Nov 2012 #18
I didn't mean to do anything other than give some thoughts on your comments karynnj Nov 2012 #20
Went back and cleaned up my comment politicasista Dec 2012 #21
The entire premise is out in left field. n/t wisteria Nov 2012 #5
ok n/t politicasista Nov 2012 #7
No, the left field does not like her. Mass Nov 2012 #9
HAHAHAH JI7 Nov 2012 #12
Here's more Mass Nov 2012 #13
n/t.. LOL wisteria Dec 2012 #22
Isn't it much nicer when expressed this way Mass Nov 2012 #15
Yeah, he is much needed. wisteria Dec 2012 #23
it just shows why he would have been great as President JI7 Dec 2012 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author politicasista Nov 2012 #19
Well, this is your answer concerning filibuster Mass Dec 2012 #25
That sounds reasonable. beachmom Dec 2012 #26
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»John Kerry»Filibuster reform?»Reply #4