Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Found on Radfem website [View all]Behind the Aegis
(54,865 posts)71. It ruffles my feathers too.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I know it's fun to laugh at the crazies, but what does any of this really prove?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#11
I honestly don't know. Maybe they think those "other" feminists aren't feminist enough.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#13
That is a good message RE: double standards. We're all human, we should all be treated (mostly)
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#15
I agree that that kind of treatment is over-the-top and unfair. Especially when plenty of genuine
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#22
I certainly didn't mean to imply that those cited in the OP have anything to do with genuine social
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#17
That is a valid point. I guess I just don't see cis-males as a socially disadvantaged group
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#23
"Couldn't be more different"? How so? African-Americans (and others) have been historically
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#25
We can measure racial disadvantage experienced by African or Native Americans in many ways.
lumberjack_jeff
Dec 2013
#29
Far more likely to be sexually assaulted. More likely to be killed or seriously injured by domestic
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#31
So you actually think women are privileged over men in this society? Seriously?
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#33
I know it's not as simple as "all men are advantaged" and "all women are disadvantaged"
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#40
Yeah, it's really not a safe (or fair) world for anyone. I'll agree with that much. n/t
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#44
I guess the rebuttal would be that women are far more likely than men to be killed or
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#41
Things *have* changed, obviously. I just wish cultural attitudes didn't lag so far behind legal
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#45
Okay, maybe I exaggerated a bit. But they're certainly the loudest at least.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#51
There's also plenty of women who don't feel they have been discriminated against
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#52
Again, any given experience is not necessarily universal. And yes, it *should* be about
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#54
So you think that entirely (or at least mostly) accounts for the pay gap? Consider me skeptical...
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#75
Interesting... I do think there's probably a good deal of truth to what you're saying.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#77
I think the way you just explained things is basically accurate, in a lot of respects.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#79
Like I said, cultural attitudes lagging behind legal realities. It's a significant problem no matter
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#48
The "radfems" at my university considered some of the most prominent feminists of the 20th Century
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Dec 2013
#37
I basically agree. And I think the whole issue of who is or isn't a "real" feminist is hopelessly
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#21
You are 100% correct. For instance, I get accused of being "anti-Feminist" for criticizing Dworkin
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#27
Let me clarify- I don't support reading things into people's words that they haven't explicitly said
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#58
Interesting to note; some people REALLY don't like it when certain aquatic fowl are mentioned
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2013
#68
Well, there's a lot of protesting about smearing people they supposedly don't know or care about
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Dec 2013
#81