Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: Can we have a discussion on this article? [View all]nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)53. Gotcha. I agree with the general observation even if I may quibble with some interpretations of it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Honestly, yes. I have no real ulterior motive here. Just noting the problematic aspects of the MRM.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#2
Then why the provacative, disrepectful title? Why not the title of the article?
Behind the Aegis
Dec 2013
#3
Their ideas do have influence, though, mainly but not exclusively on conservatives.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#7
I hope you're right. My point of view may not be quite as optimistic though. n/t
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#10
I think, rather than focusing on a movement, all cases must be argued based on individual merits
Bonobo
Dec 2013
#5
Not much, on that particular subject. But to me the article is less about custody cases per se
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#12
You do realize that the 2nd wave feminist movement was mostly white females, yes?
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#25
Those are all legitimate issues. Which is why I wish more men's groups would actually *address* them
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#29
I wasn't referring specifically to college enrollment ratios. I see that as relatively minor
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#33
I can't disagree with that. And like I said, we can certainly help boys without hurting girls.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#35
There is some truth to that, but feminism is too large and complex to really have one "direction"
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#41
Okay, in that respect you have more of a point. But I still think you're oversimplifying a bit.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#44
Point taken. Though while there may be "two different feminist groups" there are many more than two
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#47
I'm pointing out that there was a major divergence in mainstream feminism ideology
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#50
Gotcha. I agree with the general observation even if I may quibble with some interpretations of it.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#53
Lurking out here, I notice "fathers rights activist" is a generic expression
Eleanors38
Dec 2013
#15
They're mostly political and social conservatives. Mostly white, but religion and social class I'm
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#16
Perhaps I was mistaken, then. As I said, if anything only the most extreme should be seen that way.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#27
Of course. But as I said, that's largely a red herring for some of these groups. n/t
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#26
How about we teach everybody, at a young age, not to be violent to people they supposedly love,
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#28
I know the pay gap is one thing we've sort of agreed to disagree on, and that's fine.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#31
The Ledbetter Act was a return to the status quo which had existed for many years
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#36
Or simply that said "public policy solutions" aren't complex enough to address the issue.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#38
"Very little in Column B"? I don't really see how this issue is simple enough for such definitive
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#40
If you can point to a single pay gap study that contradicts this, please let me know
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#42
I think it's less a matter of direct gender-based discrimination, and more of ingrained cultural
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#45
That's why I was suggesting that parental leave shouldn't be implicitly stigmatized and punished
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#49
Which is one reason why, as I said, such a thing as "perfect equality" may not be possible or even
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#52
Understood. I'd just like to see more flexibility for new parents and less unreasonable demands
nomorenomore08
Dec 2013
#55
Solving the economic issues isn't really all that hard and is largely gender neutral
Major Nikon
Dec 2013
#56