The Medea Complex and the Parental Alienation Syndrome

[ElboRuum]

61. I'm only going to reply to this post.

I simply don't have the time to go through this pile of... stuff... to reply to each individually.

First, are you saying through the flurry of replies to the same post that it was literally inconceivable for you to consolidate this "evidence" into a single post? Seriously, how the hell do you expect to reply to any of it if you won't even adhere to that simple courtesy?

Or was that the point? Sluice the thread with a big pile of anecdotals, advocacy briefs, and rhetorical fallacies and hope that something sticks to the wall? Nice to know that when questioned, rather than answer the question, you simply start spamming the thread with a lot of noise.

Note that in all of this I still don't know what specifically you are claiming to prove with it, since you've never actually mentioned points that you were attempting to make with any of your posts, but whatever, I'm not holding my breath for that. To whit, regardless of the point, one thing that is missing from all of your posts in this thread is you a single shred of peer-reviewed scientific validation for the (presumed) conjecture that the phenomenon discussed in the OP does not exist, even if conceptually rather than in the terms Gardner presents. This, of course, was the point of discussion here. Rather, you have only presented how the legal system may view it, which means precisely nothing in this context. As I said before, I do not trust lawyers with science. Their purpose is advocacy, to get what they can for their clients, and are rarely interested in the truth as reasoned people understand it.