Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Education

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)

1. I saw an article last week that said

Reply to eridani (Original post)

Wed Sep 16, 2015, 04:21 AM

Sep 2015

That if all students are screened for ap versus only kids whose parents put them forward for testing, which is how it's done now, many more children actually qualify for ap studies and many of those otherwise untested kids are minorities and other underserved children. Duh!!!

But the way Rahm us wrecking CPS don't expect much. He's all about prioritizing everything.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Outraged Dad Wonders If a Public Speaking Class Is Only for Rich Kids [View all] eridani Sep 2015 OP

I saw an article last week that said elehhhhna Sep 2015 #1

That dealt with GT testing. Igel Sep 2015 #12

The most liberal SCOTUS in US history considered a related issue and essentially said to merrily Sep 2015 #2

That case ShrimpPoboy Sep 2015 #4

Reply 2 says essentially those same things. merrily Sep 2015 #8

I was just elaborating ShrimpPoboy Sep 2015 #10

Civics is an "advanced-sounding" course? oberliner Sep 2015 #3

OK, what the hell is an AP class? MattSh Sep 2015 #5

Advanced Placement Courses Cosmocat Sep 2015 #7

Thanks! MattSh Sep 2015 #9

ap Phil1934 Sep 2015 #6

Forget "separate but equal" - today's ruling class shamelessly flaunts school inequality! reformist2 Sep 2015 #11

There are two separate but equal issues involved. Igel Sep 2015 #13