Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
2. GATS (1995) TTIP, TiSA, TPP, and WTO (+USA) are making commercialization of much education mandatory
Sat Feb 27, 2016, 10:26 PM
Feb 2016

around the world by means of permanent, irreversible trade deals which do an end run around elections.

The exemptions are systems where education (or health care - the same issues and rules apply there) has been completely free since before December 1994 or 1998. (this is due to the standstill/ratchet and scope definition in GATS Article I:3 - as well as GATS *dates* (according to Ms. Lori Wallach's reading of the use of standstill dates in TiSA this would be likely 1995 for non financial and 1998 for financial services) being borrowed in TiSA.

So, in the case of health care, Canada's Medicare may be able to escape privatization if it manages to keep money completely out of the picture which may subject it to attack under the new trade deals. (See the http://policyalternatives.ca web site under Trade project, for numerous explorations of this and related questions.)

Its less likely dates in 1998 would apply in TPP -its more likely the date of WTO accession (late 1994) would likely be the "standstill" rollback, etc. date (date subsequent nonconforming regulations would be rolled back to.)

The first US-style trade deal to start the commoditization process was our 1995 GATS or General Agreement on Trade in Services.

You can read more about Article I:3's definition of the scope of what services are exempted here in

http://www.iatp.org/files/GATS_and_Public_Service_Systems.htm

This statement by the 850 member European University Association identifies the deals as attacks on the continued existence of public higher education.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Students Testify on Capit...»Reply #2