Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
14. Not to pick a fight,
Tue Dec 11, 2012, 12:46 AM
Dec 2012

but there is no such thing as a "public charter school." They don't have to be corporate run to qualify as a private school that is set up to get public money.

Charter schools are NOT public schools. There is a LOT more to being a public school than taking taxpayer money.

"Reformers" used to come up with that junk of calling charter schools "public schools," but nowadays the reformers don't pretend these schools to be anything other than private schools that are set up to get public money.

As far as I am concerned, charter schools should have all taxpayer money cut off. If any are any good, let them operate as the private schools they truly are and charge tuition.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Teaching in 2012 - Teache...»Reply #14