Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
15. I'm a proponent of open educational resources and MOOCs. Excerpt below:
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:56 PM
Dec 2012

Without peerless grades, record setting SATs, and about $60,000 a year in tuition and fees, the closest many of us will get to seeing the inside of a Harvard or MIT classroom is to rent “The Social Network,” “Good Will Hunting” or “21.” But this fall, the opportunity to experience for yourself what it takes to pass a class at these prestige college brands got real—or virtual, to be more precise. Whether in a bedroom in Lincoln, Neb., on a commuter bus in Atlanta, or an office in New Delhi, anyone with an Internet connection can not only sit in on lectures of PH207 at Harvard or CS184.1 at University of California at Berkley, but can go through chronologically during the terms all of the same tests, assignments, and interactions with faculty as the freshmen and sophomores at these otherwise selective institutions. This is distance learning taken to a new level. Welcome to edX.

In a bold and costly experiment in new educational techniques, Harvard and nearby MIT in Cambridge, Mass., invested $30 million each last spring to launch edX. This not-for-profit group has built a software platform that aims to bring the classroom experience even closer to students than distance learning has in the past, and to do so for free. Enrollees view the same lectures as their high-paying classmates at the schools, take the same tests, get grades and even share ideas with classmates. But these students aren’t paying (at least not yet), and they aren’t getting formal college credit. Many of the classes will offer “certificates of mastery” upon completion of the course, but the edX experiment is grounded for now in the notion that a great education does not necessarily need to lead to a degree.

The two schools were joined soon after by UC Berkeley and will welcome the University of Texas in the Summer of 2013. edX began as an “MITx” experiment to bring Professor Anant Agarwal’s electrical engineering class to a broad audience for free. After 150,000 students from 160 countries registered for the course, other schools took notice. The platform for edX is based on the original MITx system but the organization regards it as open source. A base of tools for self-paced learning, wiki-based collaborations, grading, etc. are already in place, but the enterprise is expecting the platform to grow as new professors and institutions add and share features. In addition to being free virtualizations of real courses taught by some of the best professors at the leading schools in the world, edX is also designed as a lab for online learning. The institutions are trying to learn how students learn online, with the goal of creating better hybrid models of live and virtual learning environments for students actually attending the schools, as well. In the CS50 course we started, for instance, the professor and his teaching team created new video modules expressly for the edX implementation that also benefited the 700+ live students in the lecture hall.

Because all edX work is done remotely, at massive scale, and without direct contact between instructors and students, the platform has in place special tools and procedures for managing the unique experience. Many of the classes such as Agarwal’s engineering course, use “autograding” that automates in real time the grading of quizzes. Students get immediate feedback on whether they are getting the answers right. Also, enrollment requires that all users agree to an online “Honor Code” to ensure against abusing the virtuality of the system. Enrollees pledge at the outset that all the work they submit is their own, that they do not share their account username and password with anyone else and that they do not post any answers to testing materials publicly for others to use. Finally, and perhaps a nod to the possibility of artful hackers, the pledge includes a promise “not to engage in any activity that would dishonestly improve my results, or improve or hurt the results of others.” And in a new feature that will launch in 2013, edX is hoping to enhance the legitimacy of the remote experience by offering live final exams. In partnership with educational technology and testing company Pearson VUE, at least one course in the edX curriculum will offer a proctored live exam at testing facilities the company runs in 110 countries.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I've taught Distance Learning college courses. IMO an acceptable procedure as a MINIMUM would jody Dec 2012 #1
Careful! Everytime online education comes up, the thread turns into a bloodbath! TheDebbieDee Dec 2012 #2
Thanks for telling me Renew Deal Dec 2012 #3
I expect you to be clobbered any minute by a roving band of posters with teaching credentials... TheDebbieDee Dec 2012 #5
I don't think you're reporting accurately. I think teachers are pretty open to using computers HiPointDem Dec 2012 #8
Addendum to #1 jody Dec 2012 #4
"distance education is just as effective" -- for who? the largest test of computerized k12 HiPointDem Dec 2012 #9
Completely different models. MOOCs aren't designed for K12 deployment. NYC_SKP Dec 2012 #11
which is why i asked "for who"? but of course, distance learning is already being used at the HiPointDem Dec 2012 #14
Threatens! Good. nt jody Dec 2012 #17
yes, we know. but be careful what you wish for. because what you're likely to get is something HiPointDem Dec 2012 #18
Doesn't matter, IMO distance learning is the future for most degrees other than STEM and jody Dec 2012 #19
It doesn't matter? Of course it matters. FYI, STEM classes are already done totally on-line for HiPointDem Dec 2012 #20
Key is your last sentence re "elite students". Those few are the ones jody Dec 2012 #21
and they'll be educated at real universities, not online. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #22
Agree and society should pay the entire cost plus give those students a stipend. jody Dec 2012 #23
Society should pay the entire cost of educating *all* its children. and not online. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #24
I didn't miss your point. I added to it. IMO "elite" students you address should have all the jody Dec 2012 #25
College. nt jody Dec 2012 #16
For companies who think it's more important to profit than educate CreekDog Jan 2013 #26
I don't know why you think it is particularly expensive. mbperrin Dec 2012 #6
Wow! I'm surprised that no one has come into this thread TheDebbieDee Dec 2012 #7
do grown ups makes loaded remarks about other adults 'growing up"? i think not. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #10
Post removed Post removed Dec 2012 #12
do adults tell people to stfu & go get laid? i think not. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #13
I'm a proponent of open educational resources and MOOCs. Excerpt below: NYC_SKP Dec 2012 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»At edX, Distance Learning...»Reply #15