Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

savebigbird

(417 posts)
5. I saw that particular program segment recently.
Sat Dec 29, 2012, 08:26 AM
Dec 2012

I have multiple major problems with this school model.

1. The creator has a background in business, not education, and has only three years of teaching experience. Truly successful schools are not run like businesses, and three years of teaching experience typically doesn't qualify anyone to run one school, much less multiple schools.

2. This school model is over reliant on automated, self-teaching via computerized games with insufficient guidance and adult supervision. In addition, students' classroom teachers do not receive data related to students' progress in their online learning games. Therefore, their teachers cannot correlate what occurs in the classroom with the gaming.

3. Students are not given opportunities to study music or art. Music and art compliment cognitive growth and provide for career opportunities later in life and simply make humans happier. Denying students the opportunity to study these subjects deprives them of cognitive and affective growth.

4. Their understanding of differentiated instruction is flawed. They see differentiation as allowing students to move at different paces through a prescribed set and order of levels and concepts in computerized learning gaming. This is NOT adequate differentiation. Differentiation is so much more complex than this business allows for. Please see http://www.scholastic.com/teachers/article/what-differentiated-instruction for more information on differentiation if you're interested.

In my opinion, we need to stop taking the attitude that our public education system is broken so it needs to be replaced as a whole. There are many, many terrific things public schools do that we can build upon. There is no need to throw out all of the work and development public schools have done.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Short answer: No MichiganVote Dec 2012 #1
McSchools for the poor Starry Messenger Dec 2012 #2
Anyone else bothered by the idea of mass production in our schools? proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #7
I absolutely hate it. Starry Messenger Dec 2012 #13
It's not just you. nt LWolf Dec 2012 #18
Another attempt to pilfer taxpayer money duffyduff Dec 2012 #3
Three years of experience. Just about enough time to start calling on about equal numbers mbperrin Dec 2012 #4
+1 proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #6
I saw that particular program segment recently. savebigbird Dec 2012 #5
They need it to be broken. They've been at this for over 30 years now. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #8
When will the American people open their eyes... savebigbird Dec 2012 #11
It isn't about public education. It's about the taxpayer money. duffyduff Dec 2012 #9
Strikes me as another gimmicky ( yet profitable!!!) miracle. Also... Smarmie Doofus Dec 2012 #10
Bill & Melinda Gates, Among Others! savebigbird Dec 2012 #12
One would think that list would be worthy of a public disclaimer. Smarmie Doofus Dec 2012 #15
These folks sulphurdunn Dec 2012 #21
Yep! n/t savebigbird Dec 2012 #23
Yes, they work multiple jobs but have time to take their kids to art and music lessons! proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #14
Merrow is a big fan of Kipp QED Dec 2012 #16
Obviously. proud2BlibKansan Dec 2012 #17
Yep, it is. I was still working in the private sector when all the attaboy mbperrin Dec 2012 #19
I think that is meant to replace P.E. savebigbird Dec 2012 #20
A point rarely mentioned sulphurdunn Dec 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Education»Can Rocketship Launch a F...»Reply #5